↪ Replying to @tsvenson
@tsvenson @frick Jag har så många tidskrifter och nyhetskällor att jag då förmodlige måste välja bort en. Men du ger goda argument... :^)
Tagged: reply
↪ Replying to @tsvenson
@tsvenson @frick Betalvägg. Jag kommer aldrig få veta vad man gör när man inte kan något längre! 😬😜🧐
↪ Replying to @unknown
@thoresson @plannero @ptrkhmbrg @ninafogelberg @lisasallvin @digitalsamtal @TheConfMalmo @blixtgordon13 @jonastics Medhåll. Det många glömmer i Cambridge Analytica är att det inte var ett "hack". Det var ett sätt att utnyttja affärsmodellen.
↪ Replying to @jopas
@jopas Wow, beautiful insights and reasoning, and lots of stuff for me dig to into. Thanks for sharing!
↪ Replying to @unknown
@sladner @movito @shannonmattern Wait I thought he finalized the English version... I can check with him tomorrow. Meanwhile, here's our interview with Jonas from 2012(!)
uxpodcast.com/episode-32-jam…
@sladner @movito @shannonmattern It's not finalized yet. Sorry. Don't mention the war 😬
↪ Replying to @unknown
@hugofroesUX @jopas @luiseduardodejo @SerRodSan @nickf @beantin Many excellent points here and some points I don’t agree entirely with. But that is normal for me.😁
I wrote some quick reflections and attached them.
Accessible text here: telegra.ph/Reflections-on…
↪ Replying to @grandeped
@grandeped @hypervisible "Please leave the room and report to the proctorlogist."
↪ Replying to @hypervisible
@hypervisible Gah, that word sounds like a medieval torture contraption...
"Sir, we're going to have you in the proctor if you do not confess to these crimes!"
↪ Replying to @plannero
@plannero @ninafogelberg @lisasallvin @digitalsamtal @TheConfMalmo @blixtgordon13 @shoshanazuboff @jonastics Tack Pär 😊 Läser ni min handbok Nina så kan jag gärna komma förbi bokcirkeln och svara på frågor, och kanske ställa några också :)
↪ Replying to @JesperBylund
@JesperBylund @kazarnowicz @beantin @charbeliam Agree, these ideas look very much in line with my thinking.
"Most people want to do good things." While likely true, I'm not sure most people take the time to figure out what "good" means for them.
Also not sure design should be the ethics department ;)
↪ Replying to @unknown
@radicallyrach @movito Getting along, building relationships, respecting each others work and being able to provide value seems to be the gist of it.
↪ Replying to @JesperBylund
@JesperBylund @letterpress_se Interesting. Do you know if they estimate the likelihood of the respondents having incentive enough to give a truthful (and representative) answer?
x.com/weylandswart/s…
↪ Replying to @charliesaidthat
@charliesaidthat @danbarker Like the writing, not the subject matter.
↪ Replying to @danbarker
@danbarker @charliesaidthat I like this article that traces it to 2015. lifehacker.com/is-this-an-inn…
↪ Replying to @letterpress_se
@letterpress_se It pisses people off and I've never heard of anyone responsible for reviewing why people unsubscribe and acting on that information.
↪ Replying to @deeped
@deeped @sanasilb Det ställer krav på kompetens och eftertänksam reflektion. Och ökar kvaliteten. Snyggt. 🙌
↪ Replying to @glumGPT
@raeBress @showYoDiq I don't save any pics on @dickpiclocator but a simple way for me to help could be to add some sort of notice that would encourage people to send you a copy, if that's at all interesting for you. Especially given that it should be consensual ones.