↪ Replying to @alundbergh
@alundbergh Haha, I'mjust tired of people saying "no, you can't do it like that!" with no interest on whether the proposed action takes us closer to the goal.
Tagged: reply
↪ Replying to @cjforms
@cjforms @deevybee Maddening way of wording this! Also, an outdated study from 1987. Vocabulary development happens today in many ways this study could not possibly take into account.
↪ Replying to @MrAlanCooper
@MrAlanCooper @johannhari101 Powerful stuff.
↪ Replying to @berkun
@berkun I use these quotes from Aristotle in one of my presentations to illustrate a similar point.
”Women are unfinished men.”
”A proper wife should be as obedient as a slave... The female is a female by virtue of a certain lack of qualities - a natural defectiveness.”
↪ Replying to @unknown
@RebbeccaTomas 😂 Yup. It's for my company, and I'm guessing there is some law that regulates this.
↪ Replying to @OlaGronlund
@OlaGronlund Bea jobbat :) Det saknas dock proportioner för felparkeringsavgift med mc.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@AngelosArnis Nice! Been planning to do something like this for a while. Right now I have two unorganized paper bags for all my stuff.
↪ Replying to @round
@round :) Did you read this by @ruchowdh?
wired.com/story/tech-nee…
↪ Replying to @BillHolohanSC
@BillHolohanSolr This story is enticing but not as directly true as the poetic telling of it (it's been told this way with the horse's ass for decades) encourages people to believe.
@snopes do a good job as always:
snopes.com/fact-check/rai…
@BillHolohanSolr @snopes I won't deny this is a cool part of history but the gauge wars seems like a hugely interesting part of it that shouldn't be missed out:
x.com/hdevalence/sta…
↪ Replying to @grumpyinnovator
@grumpyinnovator This story is enticing but not as directly true as the poetic telling of it (it's been told this way with the horse's ass for decades) encourages people to believe.
snopes.com/fact-check/rai…
↪ Replying to @unknown
@RebbeccaTomas 😬
Was thinking earlier today about the right to an offline life. We are effectively removing this right from people, and it's beginning to become a concern for me. It means we need to be making the right decisions now...
↪ Replying to @snetramelleh
@snetramelleh @ruchowdh No worries, Helle! If anyone understands, it's me :)
↪ Replying to @snetramelleh
@snetramelleh Thinking @ruchowdh would have eyes on this.
↪ Replying to @lisaehlin
@lisaehlin If you wear something twice you are now part of the climate movement. 😂 The bar has truly been lowered...
↪ Replying to @JennyTheolin
@jennytheolin Precis, det har aldrig varit många i Sverige, men för några år sedan var det full fart på konferenserna som jag besökte. Är nyfiken på skiftet i beteende.
@jennytheolin Jag har en teori om bidragande faktor... det är lite av ett generationsskifte på de här konferenserna. Alla med Twitter är någon annanstans.
↪ Replying to @PavelASamsonov
@PavelASamsonov Could be. Or other, closed channels, that I'm not part of, are satisfying the need
↪ Replying to @jmspool
@jmspool You're probably right. Trying to figure out if that backchannel then was ever a need and/or if we are missing something. But realizing I'd need to do more extensive research. Wish I was a dude who could jump tp conclusions and feel confident about my biases being truth 😂. Not.