Per Axbom Twitter

Main reason I'm wary of nuclear power is my field of expertise: communication science.

I once did an exercise creating long-time nuclear waste warning messages for 10,000 years in the future.

It's acutely obvious to me how this will fail miserably. 🧵

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-time…

I do believe Thomas Seboek was on the right track proposing an Atomic Priesthood. The priesthood would preserve the knowledge of radioactive waste's locations and dangers through rituals and myths. We do love stories. But believing them 10,000 years from now?

The idea of cats changing color due to radiation, perhaps? In 2014, musician Emperor X wrote such a song called "Don't Change Color, Kitty", designed to be "so catchy and annoying that it might be handed down from generation to generation over a span of 10,000 years".

So many absurd ideas have been proposed over the past decades. Task groups are pulling their hair. And while this glaring problem and threat to future humans persists, their wellbeing seems to rest on the success of these absurdities.

hyperallergic.com/312318/a-nucle…

Great listening tip from @beantin on this topic.

The Nuclear Priesthood.
How could we warn people 100 000 years in the future about buried nuclear waste? Poet Paul Farley explores the options - pictures and monuments to Atomic Folk Tales.

bbc.co.uk/programmes/p09…

Topical. And very real. After decades of mismanaging its nuclear waste, the US Department of Energy wrestles with its toxic legacy.

ā€entire cottage home-health-care industries have sprung up around nuclear sitesā€

vqronline.org/reporting-arti…

šŸ”— Originally posted on Twitter

Per Axbom Twitter

When spending time on forecasting biometric abuse it’s important to note the bucket of examples is bottomless. Imagine this toilet installed in workplaces, or even at a friend’s. Article mentions stool dropping time, urine velocity and, wait for it... 1/2

theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2…

analprint. You don’t have to tell the toilet who in the family is doing number two. It simply reads the distinctive features of your ā€anodermā€ (the skin of the anal canal). Your ā€œanalprintā€, like your fingerprints, is of course unique. Push that to the cloud.āœ”ļø

šŸ”— Originally posted on Twitter

Per Axbom Twitter

I review about 40 sites for a prize every year. This is my fourth year. I always meet the deadline, but always on the very last day. What is fascinating is that even though it's a hard deadline this client never feels the need to check in or remind me. I appreciate this soo much!

Anyway, don't 'at' me because today is that deadline and I need three more hours to get things done. šŸ˜…

šŸ”— Originally posted on Twitter

Per Axbom reply Twitter

↪ Replying to @unknown

@harrybr Primarily a lack of space and the design system not ready for it. Things a bit outside my control… 😬 The context is hard to explain and not sure how much I can write about. There are many, many actors involved. The icon really is a small part of my bigger challenges šŸ˜…

@harrybr But yeah, the letters OK have been considered. And today, it’s all words in the bigger picture of it all. The icon is really to complement the words. But the words, as they stand now, can also confuse… but are used in so many places… it’s surprisingly complicated. x.com/axbom/status/1…

šŸ”— Originally posted on Twitter

Per Axbom Twitter

The same media that is exposing bad practices of surveillance capitalism in tech are promoting and making use of those same practices of surveillance capitalism on their own platforms.

It's turtles all the way down.

x.com/pinboard/statu…

It's not only surveillance capitalism. It's systemic.

The New York Times broke the story about Manchin crafting the US climate plan, and then included some paid fossil fuel propaganda in the text.

Turtles, I say. All the way down.

heated.world/p/the-nyt-stop…

šŸ”— Originally posted on Twitter

Per Axbom reply Twitter

↪ Replying to @unknown

@Loukas_RS @martenschultz Just det, Googlebombing myntades ju nƤr en sƶkning pƄ "miserable failure" ledde till George Bush profilsida. Det hƤr Ƥr en oerhƶrt intressant vinkel pƄ samma effekt, att sƶkning pƄ personnamn kan "avslƶja" det som tidningar fƶrsƶker anonymisera.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_bo…

šŸ”— Originally posted on Twitter