This is spot on and requires a response from @TwitterSafety x.com/AishaTaIks/sta…
↪ Replying to @ellecer
@ellecer Non-English would likely not pose a problem, but this would depend more on Facebook's relationship with Duterte and his ability to ban Facebook from the country entirely. As Facebook reports have shown, some people are allowed more leeway in breaking rules than others.
Facebook has started developing a new troll battling technology based on machine learning and the only reasonable measure of success is that the company itself self-implodes.
Read more here. Article also mentions how Facebook in 2018 tried to change its algorithm to increase “meaningful interactions” between friends and family, but ended up making them argue with each other.
thenextweb.com/news/facebook-…
↪ Replying to @unknown
@weylandswart 😊 Oh I definitely feel they are following their (Mark's) plan to the teeth.
They've reached ludicrous speed, total tunnel vision and there are few actors who understand how, or have the ability to, enforce friction to slow them down.
In case you've missed it, these are Facebook's five guiding principles for the new #SurveillanceGlasses. How they're going to get people to comply is anyone's guess. 🤷
Also I can't believe nobody has used the hashtag #SurveillanceGlasses to describe this phenomenon before. You essentially can not have "smart", in the modern tech sense of the word, without surveillance. I believe awareness of this symbiosis must grow.
This piece of hardware set me on my path 40 years ago. RIP Clive Sinclair, inventor behind the ZX81, who passed away yesterday - at the age of 81.
bbc.com/news/science-e…
That screenshot of me is by @andyvitale, when I was interviewed by him and @lwelchman on @SurfacingPod earlier this year.
surfacingpodcast.com/per-axbom
"..concern for privacy has evolutionary roots in a need to maintain boundaries between self and others, for safety and security. "
"Stripped of the social cues that tend to ring our emotional alarm bells, the online environment elicits a muted response."
psyche.co/ideas/our-evol…
Last year was so distressing I do not even remember making this image. 😳. Found it in a search and can't remember in what context I made this. Scary... x.com/axbom/status/1…
Hey everyone interested in #DigitalEthics and how #Facebook manage unaccountability over and over again. Read Jason's thread and listen to the 20 minute WSJ podcast. x.com/jason_kint/sta…
Also: x.com/scottmonty/sta…
↪ Replying to @ohlserik
@ohlserik Yes, Johan did a good sketch: x.com/j_schalin/stat…
↪ Replying to @aDreamersWaltz
@aDreamersWaltz @deformador Similar here while I believe it's just as common to just stick to red for all marks.
Reminds me of those awesome pens with four retractable colors.
↪ Replying to @aDreamersWaltz
@aDreamersWaltz @deformador Cool, thanks for sharing!
↪ Replying to @sojge
@sojge @alundbergh Seeing them each on their own, for me they would both mean ”something selected”, but I’m sure not for everyone. That would also be interesting study.
With regards to emojis it’s of course dangerous to assume to much as that X is red on several platforms:
emojipedia.org/cross-mark-but…
↪ Replying to @heyitsmejak
@heyitsmejak @leeloowrites I added some more info to the thread. Not quite there yet. x.com/axbom/status/1…
↪ Replying to @alundbergh
@alundbergh Yes, good example. I’d say that the first one is a check mark and the second one denotes something being selected.
↪ Replying to @alundbergh
@alundbergh True. As we know though, red/green color blindness is the most common variety of color deficiency.
↪ Replying to @Silanota
@Silanota I've actually put it up on Amazon. But it's in Swedish! Would love to translate it at some point but it's would still be difficult to understand the English to Swedish comparisons...
Crazy to realise I wrote it in 1995... 😬
amazon.com/Den-om%C3%B6jl…