↪ Replying to @augmentedrobot
@augmentedrobot I have but I'd forgotten about it! Thank you for sharing.
↪ Replying to @augmentedrobot
@augmentedrobot I have but I'd forgotten about it! Thank you for sharing.
↪ Replying to @ilovegraphics
@ilovegraphics Exactly! I'm going to be thinking about all these threads for weeks. I almost read it as a journalist's version of a systems thinking map.
↪ Replying to @WolfgangBremer
@WolfgangBremer It's an anagram of "Immortal Lost Empire Sudo". Sudo of course is the Unix command "superuser do" which allows one user to execute code as if they were another user. This alludes to the immortal, but covert, mind control power of words: putting thoughts in the heads of others.
↪ Replying to @kolombiken
@kolombiken I thought of you actually. I think I have to go 3rd party app as well.
↪ Replying to @GabiGitli
@GabiGitli I’m glad you asked 😊
To understand this one needs to understand two main problems:
1) A person using a screen reader may be exposed to multiple instances of “Read more” without context.
2) A person controlling a browser through voice needs a unique phrase to activate a link.
@GabiGitli The best links are
a) understandable outside their visual context on a page, and
b) unique in the sense that the same phrase is not used to link to different pages.
@GabiGitli A common workaround is to repeat the title of the linked page in the read more link. But as the title of a “teaser” is usually already linked, this often creates duplicate links to the same article.
@GabiGitli The other option is to hide the “read more” link altogether, and only link the title. This is valid but risks leaving the reader hanging, not knowing where to go from there.
@GabiGitli Another option is to include the full title in the read more link and NOT link the title in the teaser. There would be one understandable link providing the right context in the right position.
@GabiGitli But there is still a valid expectation of a linked title, which could be resolved by Javascript, pulling the link from the other link, and not exposing that link to the screen reader.
@GabiGitli One could also link the whole teaser block. When the reader reaches an ellipsis which breaks the content where the read more link would have been placed, they can still click anywhere to. Again this would require Javascript to ensure that the entire text is not exposed as a link.
@GabiGitli There are more options – and a new attribute known as aria-labelled-by which can come in handy. The chosen option will depend on context. And in the end it’s most important to bring in representatives who experience the issues we are trying to resolve, and listen to their input.
@GabiGitli To sum up: even seemingly small decisions will require effort to be inclusive. Many of them involve vulnerable people who are systematically ignored. And this is when change takes more time than at first feels reasonable…
//end
↪ Replying to @beantin
@beantin @LinkedIn I love that inspecting the code is how you figured it out 😅
Everyone of course needs to listen to episode 244. Weirdly I was just recommending this episode in my morning meeting, for the same reasons - icons are not universally understood.
uxpodcast.com/244-icons-pict…
↪ Replying to @imdoinfine
@imdoinfine Will add this to my everyday Task List: "Throw trash in bin, it's to your left." And then add a speaker to the bin that regularly announces: "I'm feeling all empty inside!"
Now to figure out how I'll remember to empty the bin.
↪ Replying to @blogisch
@blogisch @Sproudofficial Didn't know what to expect, but that was funny. 😅
↪ Replying to @unknown
@opassande Imorse hade jag denna bakgrund i ett möte med fyra andra personer och ingen sa ett ljud om den. Så det är uppenbart dags för nästa steg. Eller bara ett tecken på att man är mätt på mina upptåg...
↪ Replying to @unknown
@opassande Man har inte roligare än man gör sig. Men jag väljer ofta noga bakgrund efter vilka som deltar, även om jag gärna pressar gränserna och just söker reaktioner ;)
↪ Replying to @unknown
@A_Silvers @inkblurt I figured it out! If you can read a sentence about a company that ends with the word "successful", replace that word with "harmful", and the sentence still is legit: then the company is not successful.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@A_Silvers @inkblurt Amazon just launched in Sweden the other week and it pains me to my core. Pain. Invoking pain in others seems to be a tenet of WEIRD success.

↪ Replying to @Skolinkvisition
@Skolinkvisition Jag skulle gärna se den, eller inspelning av den, vid tillfälle.
↪ Replying to @inkblurt
@inkblurt 💯 And we really do need to start shifting the consensus on what success means and feels like.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@theredheadsaid I have never used a check in my life. True story.
@theredheadsaid The US, Singapore and China are check power users, but for most countries there has been a steep decline in the past two decades. I got a bank card when I was 16 in (1990) and have only ever used cash or cards since then. Or bank transfers…
theverge.com/ad/16774328/am…
↪ Replying to @unknown
@theredheadsaid That the US even still uses checks never fails catch me by surprise.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@theredheadsaid I wrote a lot of poetry in my teens. Sometimes I reminisce :)