↪ Replying to @MrAlanCooper
@MrAlanCooper Wow, that is beyond impressive. Shivers.
↪ Replying to @MrAlanCooper
@MrAlanCooper Wow, that is beyond impressive. Shivers.
↪ Replying to @MrAlanCooper
@MrAlanCooper It really did! Even more so because I hadn't previously realized the word "sloyd" was used in English, from the Swedish "slöjd". Here it's a subject in school as well.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sloyd
↪ Replying to @EmilOberg
@EmilOberg Might be! If I personally pay for Apple+ content, and not the others, I as a consumer would obviously expect to more easily see the content I have paid for, rather than the content I’ve chosen not to pay for. If it’s an antitrust issue that’s super interesting.
↪ Replying to @bzamayo
@bzamayo Thank you Benjamin! I felt like I was the crazy one when I was reading the responses in the other thread. At least now I have company 😅
#thatgaslitfeeling
↪ Replying to @MrAlanCooper
@MrAlanCooper They are laughing so hard at us though…
↪ Replying to @lillerik
@lillerik I truly don’t understand. I want the AppleTV+ content that I’m paying for and I want that content easy to find, without it being intermixed with content that I’m not paying for…
You’re saying there is another way to do that?
↪ Replying to @RobotDeathSquad
@RobotDeathSquad Right, but I’m paying for Apple TV+. It’s not free. So I’m paying for something and they decided to make that content hard to find and intermix it with content that costs extra.
↪ Replying to @lillerik
@lillerik Because I want to search for all the stuff that is already part of my Apple subscription that I am paying for. Having the two mixed is very confusing for me. It's like using Netflix and 75% of the titles are things I have to pay extra for.
↪ Replying to @lillerik
@lillerik Relevancy, autonomy and compassion, would be the point. 😊
↪ Replying to @LenaLeigert
@LenaLeigert @augmentedrobot Hon blev taggad som bot av Twitter. Enda vägen ut var att stänga kontot och komma tillbaka senare. I samband med det tappade hon alla kontakter 😕
x.com/axbom/status/1…
↪ Replying to @yessshir
@yessshir More to cover all bases and be able to move in any direction based on the conversation. We spent most time on four of these “arms” and some never came up.
But now I also have material for a blog post. :)
↪ Replying to @unknown
@httpsterio @krenaud @DickPicLocator All I really want to do - more and more - is write without having the tech get in the way. From my experience with Ghost it’s letting me do that to a much larger extent than Wordpress. I’ve considered a lot of options, but hosted also relieves pain points :)
↪ Replying to @krenaud
@krenaud @httpsterio @DickPicLocator Thanks. Still, makes me more confident I’m making the right choice by moving to Ghost. :)
↪ Replying to @krenaud
@krenaud @httpsterio @DickPicLocator What the devil…. it’s a Wordpress-hosted blog… wondering if they’re having issues… thank you!
↪ Replying to @unknown
@httpsterio @DickPicLocator What? The blog site?
↪ Replying to @unknown
@kazarnowicz @Beastankar @emanuelkarlsten Jodå, de har så smått bekräftat. x.com/GreiderDD/stat…
↪ Replying to @Beastankar
@Beastankar @emanuelkarlsten Exakt!
@Beastankar @emanuelkarlsten Och se'n kollar man en gång till och inser att det fortfarande är mycket möjligt att det är deepfake... bara rösterna de behöver ordna och när de sjunger kan det förstås vara lättare... men jag gissar att det är bekräftat av de medverkande.
@Beastankar @emanuelkarlsten Tänker närmast på Sassy Justice och att det är så lätt att glömma hur dessa deepfakes inte kräver så himla mycket längre i produktionskostnader... youtube.com/watch
↪ Replying to @emanuelkarlsten
@emanuelkarlsten Wow. Första sekundrarna trodde jag det var deepfake, men näe...
↪ Replying to @ProfSunnySingh
@ProfSunnySingh Imagining the private chatrooms of groups of legal scholars blowing up across the US. Oh how I would love to listen in on some of these conversations.