↪ Replying to @unknown
@johnantoni @beantin Good choice. This was my equivalent: Sinclair ZX81 BASIC Programming.

↪ Replying to @unknown
@johnantoni @beantin Good choice. This was my equivalent: Sinclair ZX81 BASIC Programming.

↪ Replying to @lwelchman
@lwelchman @jarango @uxpodcast @beantin Excellent, for myself, I'll get the opportunity to hang out with @jarango in at @WIAD_Zuerich
↪ Replying to @unknown
@juliabirks It was part of my course when studying to become a coach, and it gave me thinking tools that I can apply everywhere in work and life. Maybe the most important tool being the explanation of paths as "waves", where we need to stop regularly and re-align our direction with our goal.
Name one book that changed your life.
I'll start:
"Feel the Fear and Do It Anyway" by Susan Jeffers.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@sara_ann_marie Awesome! Now that you're so close I have to see if I can make it over there!
Dieter Rams: If I Could Do It Again, “I Would Not Want To Be A Designer”
fastcompany.com/3043815/dieter…
From time to time I return to the images in this thread... it's a good reminder of the de-humanization going on around us. x.com/visakanv/statu…
I can't help but feel that 20 years ago it was easier to keep track of news, friends and companies using RSS and Google Reader.
The number of times I lose something now because I can't remember where I found it, or a feed refreshes and I can't be bothered, is worrying.
The islands of content broke the web. More bridges are needed. And a way for individuals to gain back control.
And yes, Google Reader was launched in 2005 and closed in 2013 (citing less usage as a reason), so 20 years is more what it feels like than what it factually is 🤪
↪ Replying to @jessicaschedvin
@jessicaschedvin Tack! Vackert skrivet. Även utan penna :)
↪ Replying to @grishund
@grishund @patriciadiaz @Skolverket Har hittat flera länkar på bloggar till den men länkarna är alla döda. @skolverket måste ha flyttat eller tagit bort den :(
↪ Replying to @MrAlanCooper
@MrAlanCooper Number 38 on your list is what I’ve started 2019 with.
cc @KateRaworth
Interesting article, but this comment scares me:
”I think at this point the really dangerous nanotech is genetic, because it’s compatible with our biology and therefore it can be contagious.” wired.com/story/bill-joy…
Here’s an intro to CRISPR-Cas9 for anyone who wants to read up: labiotech.eu/features/crisp…
↪ Replying to @unknown
@JRGdesignworks @indiyoung Thx for great feedback. When I teach the tool in workshops I emphasize that we will never be able to map everyone but the tool allows us to have the discussion around all the people (and traits) we fail to take into account. It increases awareness and sensitivity. And yes >
@JRGdesignworks @indiyoung > people will move in and out of these circles, sometimes merely as a forgotten target group. I think your example is brilliant and will remind myself to bring it up with participants and students.
@JRGdesignworks @indiyoung Important to remember also is that the circle is about ”excluded” which will spur discussions around slow internet connections, ip blocks, lack of correct device/browser, language barriers, sensory overload and obviously much more.
↪ Replying to @beantin
@beantin @uxpodcast @lwelchman You'll both be awesome!! ❤️❤️ And I look forward to listening to it!
Reading my sister's doctoral thesis on Transforming Technocultures and it's just so brilliant I have shivers going down my spine. Can't wait to share it with you all. Meanwhile, go ahead and follow her, I'm hoping she'll become more active here: @thehybridself
↪ Replying to @wheelyweb
@wheelyweb I know you were, but it was good to reminisce, thanks for that. :)