↪ Replying to @unknown
@carriehd Yass! I've been considering deleting some apps that I generally like but keep asking me this. I mean, needy much?
Tagged: reply
↪ Replying to @beantin
@beantin @cydharrell @inkblurt Human-insulting design ™
↪ Replying to @dblumx
@dblumx Thank you David! Looking forward to seeing you! I remember your tweet from 2016. It meant a lot to me. And is actually quoted in my Teaching section on my website: axbom.eu/#teaching
↪ Replying to @unknown
@5u5anCarey Someone apparently(?) had the idea at one point to detect broken glass with it. Never implemented. Now it's being used to activate Google's virtual assistant.
↪ Replying to @emanuelkarlsten
@emanuelkarlsten @mediepodden Du gör detta väldigt, väldigt bra Emanuel. Stor eloge.
↪ Replying to @arodericks
@arodericks @spydergrrl @hootsuite Yeah, and Hootsuite's stats were for the US. Ideally it would be interesting to see the demographics for English-language users.
Trivia: Sweden being such a small country I know that I've actually been excluded from online stats produced about Twitter in Sweden. 🧐
↪ Replying to @unknown
@JRDPA Yeah, I don't even know how Facebook works anymore. It frustrates me every time I go in there!
↪ Replying to @DangerousDolly
@DangerousDolly Another view on Medium, which I do agree with: x.com/radiomorillo/s…
↪ Replying to @spydergrrl
@spydergrrl @ifenn I agree with Ian’s point here. We really don’t know. My tweet was more a response to Aaron who proposed that Twitter is heavily white men :)
On the other hand, I would appreciate a more transparent algorithm and the ability to give feedback on my own recommendations.
@spydergrrl @ifenn The irony of us white men stepping in here is not lost on me...
↪ Replying to @arodericks
@arodericks @spydergrrl When you say "heavily", what numbers are you looking at? For the US I've seen numbers from @hootsuite that suggest slightly more women use Twitter and 24% white. Global averages will be different from that, but I haven't seen ethnicity in recent global stats. Will look.
↪ Replying to @LouShackleton
@LouShackleton It does allow for third parties to enter that market though :) visualcv.com/linkedin-resum…
↪ Replying to @DangerousDolly
@DangerousDolly I suppose this depends on the audience you have for each platform, but I have been positively surprised by the reach of LI articles.
@DangerousDolly My point is really to post it in as many places as possible if reach is the goal. A personal blog would ideally be the primary source to ensure longevity and openness.
↪ Replying to @DangerousDolly
@DangerousDolly @LinkedInExpert @LinkedInHelp @LinkedInEditors @linkedinin When I’ve done this I’ve published in both places with Medium as the original, and then the article on Linkedin contains the text: ”First published on Medium” with a link to the original.
↪ Replying to @beantin
@beantin Yeah, the default will be prevalent, but power users may be extra happy :) Thinking now that may actually be better as a browser setting... an override of sorts. And of course it's been written about 😁 ilovefreesoftware.com/15/tutorial/fo…
↪ Replying to @alundbergh
@alundbergh Listening to this now. Scary stuff.
↪ Replying to @beantin
@beantin True! For tools my thinking now would be that there preferably is a personal setting for this (since I'm always logged in with tools).