↪ Replying to @PavelASamsonov
@PavelASamsonov @hondanhon *lurking and trash-talking in side-channel*
↪ Replying to @PavelASamsonov
@PavelASamsonov @hondanhon *lurking and trash-talking in side-channel*
↪ Replying to @bit_reader
@bit_reader Caught on a website, no escape from reality.
Open your eyes, look up to the T & C.
I’m just a poor sod, I need no sympathy,
Because I’m easy come, easy go, can I buy, bot says no.
Any way the site blows, doesn’t really matter, to me, to me.
↪ Replying to @katherinemzhou
@katherinemzhou @spotifydesign Welcome to Stockholm Kat!! Glad you're feeling better and let me know when you're ready for fika.
↪ Replying to @beantin
@beantin Ha, I was just looking at this book. goodreads.com/book/show/4181…
↪ Replying to @jhsilverman
@jhsilverman His name is Bernie and he likes to shuffle?
↪ Replying to @ronbronson
@ronbronson @ezactron Would be interesting to do a comparison of the different ways of complying. I suppose that’s what you’re inadvertently doing...
↪ Replying to @ronbronson
@ronbronson @ezactron There’s a new law in California as of this year prohibiting default passwords in connected devices, but I guess you’re aware of this? I suppose suppliers now make all routers comply. The app solution is obviously still a very poor way of solving this.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@trinefalbe Awesome!! Really looking forward to reading this. 👊
↪ Replying to @iamdavidobrien
@iamdavidobrien With everything I make I encourage nickin’. 🙌
↪ Replying to @palace
@palace Tycker min modell illustrerar omöjligheten ganska bra! 😁
↪ Replying to @unknown
@AngelosArnis Hehe. I'm glad it makes some sense. I can probably spend a few hours just talking about the parts of the diagram.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@AngelosArnis Not the response I expected but thank you! 😀
↪ Replying to @BlakeleyHPayne
@BlakeleyHPayne Awesome points. Thank you!
↪ Replying to @BlakeleyHPayne
@BlakeleyHPayne Totally. I imagine you read this as well? theintercept.com/2019/12/20/mit…
↪ Replying to @palace
@palace Viktig poäng. Bumpar upp den i kön på läslistan. =)
↪ Replying to @palace
@palace Tänker att indirekta konskevenser också blir relevanta, men hamnar oftast i fjärde rutan, sådant vi bara kan se om vi letar efter det efter det har hänt. Mycket kommer vi förstås aldrig se.
Lägger till på läslistan!