Tagged: reply

Per Axbom reply Twitter

↪ Replying to @JesperBylund

@JesperBylund @ArchieComics And in the sense that people argue that there would become different classes of people (those with and without a “passport”) I tend to rely on reasonings around proportionality. When it comes to saving lives, that can require proportionally more restrictive regulations.

@JesperBylund @ArchieComics All this requires risk analysis and actions to mitigate risk, certainly in the form of communication and information. And especially in cases where people actually aren’t able to get a vaccine.

So, as always: it depends on context and the safety regulations in place. :)

🔗 Originally posted on Twitter

Per Axbom reply Twitter

↪ Replying to @JesperBylund

@JesperBylund @ArchieComics I think I like how Zuboff differentiates between capitalism and surveillance capitalism. So more that it’s a different version of capitalism that has risen from the insight that data about people is valuable for trade.

But I get you, I could have written just surveillance ;)

@JesperBylund @ArchieComics Vaccine passports are interesting. I had a vaccine passport most of my childhood (yellow card when travelling in Africa) so it’s not the concept of a “passport” itself that I likely would object to (I’m not finished with this reasoning but happy to spitball).

@JesperBylund @ArchieComics The dilemma is, as often when it comes to digital, is vulnerability of data and storage, and potential recklessness in handling, as well as power of access to information. Do I choose to share my information in specific situations or do others "pull it" or is it harvested.

@JesperBylund @ArchieComics But I do actually believe digital can be a huge benefit in terms of vaccination insights and potentially save many lives. Registers of vaccinations have failed to a large extent in the past, where people have very little recollection of when and what vaccines they have taken,

🔗 Originally posted on Twitter