↪ Replying to @beantin
@beantin @gmail And that pitch... "easily navigate your spaces, chat, meet and e-mail". I honestly don't use half of that.
@beantin @gmail It's a trap.
↪ Replying to @beantin
@beantin @gmail And that pitch... "easily navigate your spaces, chat, meet and e-mail". I honestly don't use half of that.
@beantin @gmail It's a trap.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@fraying @cydharrell Here's the part in their privacy policy that mentions this. It's one of the creepiest privacy policies I've read to be honest.
Essentially they make deals with the platforms we all use, that already have our email. When we use our apps to visit a site, our data is shared.

@fraying @cydharrell Even worse, what they're really saying here is that if they can figure out who you are based on the account you visited from (or a cookie), they can go to your profile and scrape any public info and use that. Would not surprise me if some of this is manual labor.
↪ Replying to @leondoughty
@leondoughty @YChalt @amanda_m_macias There is no leap. The March 7 number includes March 5 and 6.
x.com/axbom/status/1…
↪ Replying to @amanda_m_macias
@amanda_m_macias This is how I read these numbers, acknowledging that the first number likely should be spread out over several days prior. I have also averaged March 5, 6 and 7 based on the single March 7 number. (I see people interpreting an increase, while the numbers are quite steady.)

@amanda_m_macias Shown here in a line chart:
x.com/YChalt/status/…
↪ Replying to @unknown
@grenfeldt @LarssonNM @OAJonsson Jag håller med dig. Jag kände också att många lyfter denna tweet som exempel på eskalering, men att man inte tar till sig av att siffran är ackumulerad. Gör sig därför mycket bättre som stapeldiagram.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@grenfeldt @LarssonNM @OAJonsson Ja, så här läser jag siffrorna. Iofs vare sig sjunkande eller stigande... utan snarare konstant, vilket är tillräckligt otäckt.

↪ Replying to @vickytnz
@vickytnz @bayuamus @perfectKeming And for his UIE conference in Boston, the E became East. 😁
↪ Replying to @peterkz_swe
@peterkz_swe @LisaHeino Tänker att man kombinera det med ett varningssystem...
stresstålig = företaget kan inte planera
tar egna initiativ = arbetsbeskrivning saknas
positiv = vi gillar inte om du har dåliga dagar
flexibel = stå ut med allt du får tilldelat
lagspelare = du får inte jobba hemifrån
osv
↪ Replying to @rachelcoldicutt
@rachelcoldicutt Ah the solidity of surveys 😅
↪ Replying to @round
@round Today! This morning! And I was talking to @beantin about how long ago it was I did this.
I'm working on breaking down a medical test result response into information components for templating purposes. It's incredibly rewarding.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@HashtagHeyAlexa Yes! Web3 just seems to be such a huge hot mess of harmful impact all around. tante.cc/2021/12/17/the…
↪ Replying to @augmentedrobot
@augmentedrobot I see it multiple times per day and I'm not surprised it's common practice. The "social media gurus" swear by it. I'm thinking of writing a post to highlight how people with visual, cognitive and motor impairments will have a much harder time finding your link and clicking it.
↪ Replying to @ishyamo
@ishyamo Agree 💯. I must admit it had slipped my mind how the US were the last to ground the plane, and it was Trump who signed the order.
↪ Replying to @Shortwave
@Shortwave @cydharrell Thanks, this is actually exactly the type of response I like to see :) I'm well aware that the type of software you're building requires the access, and can provide real value. It truly does come down to trust, and if I feel control over my data, e.g. able to delete in a click.
↪ Replying to @Abebab
@Abebab The @w3c writes "alt text" in case that is helpful.
w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECH…
↪ Replying to @joho68
@joho68 @Shortwave Haha, I didn't mean you specifically, but I was aware that someone would likely comment on me using Gmail. :)
↪ Replying to @cydharrell
@cydharrell 😅 Me too. I'm still curious to learn from your experience with it.