Per Axbom Twitter

Been spending my morning reading Psychopathy, empathy and moral agency: Lessons from autism, along with all the comments. As one does. lovefraud.com/psychopathy-em…

Interesting about ā€Moral Reasoning Abilityā€. This of course fluctuates with the factors I mentioned yesterday:

time constraints, context-switching, self-awareness, information deficit, external pressure.

May change ā€external pressureā€ to more easily fit in reward mechanisms.

šŸ”— Originally posted on Twitter

Per Axbom Twitter

The importance of empathy in design is sometimes exaggerated. How can I, a white male in his forties, truly empathize with, for example, a 16-year old sex worker? This is why I speak about design impact, and inclusive design, which allows me to help when true empathy is lacking.

Don't get me wrong. If it could be proven that there is such a thing as an empath I would define myself thus. I can feel and adopt immense and overwhelming emotion from others. But those feelings can also be misleading. They trick me into thinking I understand the other person.

I can never be sure of understanding the frame of reference or experience of another person which is why I need to actively explore the impact of paths I choose in design. I need to see how people are hurt by design and evaluate inclusive/exclusive qualities of my work.

I need to consider all the vulnerable people I do not as easily empathize with, as I do with groups closer to my "circle". As a white male designer I need tools to help me think broader, because my privilege means I am less apt at understanding risk [as shown in research].

It is my hope that a greater awareness about responsible innovation, designing with a conscience, will force the design industry to adopt a healthier path in the tech revolution ahead. I see many voicing similar thoughts and the future looks heartening.

šŸ”— Originally posted on Twitter