↪ Replying to @jessicaschedvin
@jessicaschedvin Tack! Vackert skrivet. Även utan penna :)
↪ Replying to @jessicaschedvin
@jessicaschedvin Tack! Vackert skrivet. Även utan penna :)
↪ Replying to @grishund
@grishund @patriciadiaz @Skolverket Har hittat flera länkar på bloggar till den men länkarna är alla döda. @skolverket måste ha flyttat eller tagit bort den :(
↪ Replying to @MrAlanCooper
@MrAlanCooper Number 38 on your list is what I’ve started 2019 with.
cc @KateRaworth
Interesting article, but this comment scares me:
”I think at this point the really dangerous nanotech is genetic, because it’s compatible with our biology and therefore it can be contagious.” wired.com/story/bill-joy…
Here’s an intro to CRISPR-Cas9 for anyone who wants to read up: labiotech.eu/features/crisp…
↪ Replying to @unknown
@JRGdesignworks @indiyoung Thx for great feedback. When I teach the tool in workshops I emphasize that we will never be able to map everyone but the tool allows us to have the discussion around all the people (and traits) we fail to take into account. It increases awareness and sensitivity. And yes >
@JRGdesignworks @indiyoung > people will move in and out of these circles, sometimes merely as a forgotten target group. I think your example is brilliant and will remind myself to bring it up with participants and students.
@JRGdesignworks @indiyoung Important to remember also is that the circle is about ”excluded” which will spur discussions around slow internet connections, ip blocks, lack of correct device/browser, language barriers, sensory overload and obviously much more.
↪ Replying to @beantin
@beantin @uxpodcast @lwelchman You'll both be awesome!! ❤️❤️ And I look forward to listening to it!
Reading my sister's doctoral thesis on Transforming Technocultures and it's just so brilliant I have shivers going down my spine. Can't wait to share it with you all. Meanwhile, go ahead and follow her, I'm hoping she'll become more active here: @thehybridself
↪ Replying to @wheelyweb
@wheelyweb I know you were, but it was good to reminisce, thanks for that. :)
↪ Replying to @wheelyweb
@wheelyweb I would love to take this debate further but I honestly can't continue when I am truly in complete agreement with you. I'm imagining a scary future where my tweets are taken out of context.
↪ Replying to @wheelyweb
@wheelyweb 😘 Ah, but when Steve Wilhite decided on the pronunciation he explicity said "like the peanut butter brand Jif". Which I believe is why Oxford English Dictionary accepts BOTH pronunciations.
I miss when Twitter debates were about whether it's pronounced gif or jif.
When a narrow-minded troll has a french bulldog profile pic and I want to be mad at him but I can't because he's just so cute!
If @AOC is a sign of what 2019 will bring, I’m sensing good things ahead.
White supremacy scurried out of hiding to try and save itself from extinction, and the sudden putridity took us by surprise, but what we are hearing now is panic.
”[...] the mere thought of having a young, articulate, telegenic nonwhite woman serve is driving many on the right mad — and in their madness they’re inadvertently revealing their true selves.”
nytimes.com/2019/01/05/opi…
↪ Replying to @asaplsnr
@asaplsnr Haha, jag började läsa den igår kväll! x.com/axbom/status/1…
@asaplsnr Briljant, är min enkla bedömning.