↪ Replying to @unknown
@troed @deeped Tänker du att det är det vanligaste sättet som användarna hanterar frågan på?
↪ Replying to @deeped
@deeped Jag poängterar tydligt att CH inte är unika, såväl i ingress, inledning o avslutet. Det viktiga för mig är att alla självklart får dela sin information, men att lättvindigt dela *andras* information är det som är ett övertramp. Är också tydlig med att jag inte är helt mot appen.
@deeped Jag skriver inte heller att all informationsdelning alltid är negativ(?), utan att man bör uppmuntra försiktighet med delning. Jag nämner till exempel @project_solid som Tim Berners-Lee jobbat med, för att adressera den större problematiken. Försöker förstå ”anti-dike”.
@deeped @project_solid Nåväl, uppenbarligen misslyckades jag att nå fram med nyanseringen i det här fallet. De två invändningar du har i din tweet känner jag själv inte motsäger något jag skrivit, eller en åsikt jag har. Jag tackar för återkopplingen och hoppas lyckas bättre med orden nästa gång. 😊
↪ Replying to @JaredFossey
@JaredFossey Yes, I should have given you more credit. Best phonetic description I’ve seen.
↪ Replying to @JaredFossey
@JaredFossey Almost.
@JaredFossey Of course I don't know how you pronounce hwyds, which I thought was an awesome way of writing it 😁
The Swedish Authority for Privacy Protection has recently changed name from ’Datainspektionen’ to
’Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten’.
Yes, one word. Half my time time speaking to journalists now is spent on getting the pronunciation of that name right and hesitating each time. 😅
To complete the picture, here is the same name in three of Sweden's five official minority languages (2 are still undecided):
Finnish: Yksityisyydensuojaviranomainen
Meänkieli: Integriteettisuojaviranomhainen
Yiddish: די שוועדישע אינסטאַנץ פֿאַר אָפּהיטן פּריוואַטקייט
↪ Replying to @unknown
@Acuity_Design I have learnt so much from just attending workshops where you were clear on allowing everyone to participate on their own terms. I have adopted a lot of this - and just putting that out there for everyone creates a safer space, based on feedback . While nothing is perfect.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@Acuity_Design This started with me reflecting clinical trial consent, and then reading to understand the levels of consent: simple consent, written consent, informed consent and how the consent also affects close relationships… while it’s mostly framed as an individual, autonomous choice.
@Acuity_Design Consent as a piece of paper with a signature is somewhat distressing.
Even consent is a slippery slope. You always have to ask:
- what understanding is the consent based on?
- what loose promises are expected to be upheld by the consent?
- is the consent value-based, needs-based or coercion-based?
How consent is gained can be hugely unethical.
Adding a section on consent to my ethics curriculum. :)
I finally hung my photo of Astrid Lindgren in my studio. Bought it as a company Christmas present for myself. I don't know what does it, but I am enamored with this photograph.
So yeah, you need to click the tweet to see the full photo. I'm not talking about my panda pillow, just wanted to provide context of where it's hanging. ;)
↪ Replying to @unknown
@snowracer Skit också. Nåja, bättre att veta än att inte veta. Toppen som sagt att du flaggade.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@snowracer Haha, jag håller precis på att pilla med detta... det ligger inget konkret där ännu men jag inser att risken nu finns att någon signar upp redan nu... så jag skyndar så gott jag kan. Tänker mig ett gäng mallar och några members-only event att börja med...
Kul att du delade 😅
@snowracer Vänta, dök den upp i RSS-flödet? 😬
@snowracer Ännu viktigare nu då att du pingade mig. Tack. Förbaskade internet-trådar och rör som är felkopplade. Nej, det var helt my bad för att jag jobbade sent när jag var trött.
↪ Replying to @adtac_
@adtac_ Hoping you can help me with my latest issue after I switched domains. See email ;)
@adtac_ Trying again, still no response...
Biblioteksbladet har återpublicerat min text om Clubhouse och integriteten.
https://www.biblioteksbladet.se/nyheter/clubhouse-och-integriteten/
”In reality, a number of studies have shown that most of the money made from targeted advertising does not reach the creators of the content—the app developers and the content they host.”
eff.org/deeplinks/2020…
Loss of life
Slavery
Oppression
Impaired autonomy
Ignored voice
Hurt feelings
These are not equal harms. But sometimes the differences aren’t as clear-cut. That is why ethics is a conversation, not a checklist. Still worth noting that a checklist can assist the conversation.
Also note: these are not siloed harms and everything is subject to second and third order thinking. Ignored voice can lead to oppression can lead to loss of life. This is why strategic foresight, listening and inclusion of voices are all part of applied ethics.
Another one of those words that gets thrown around a lot as an example of harm is ’addiction’. Here are my thoughts on addiction in the tech space:
axbom.com/tech-addiction/
”Just another tech job.”
technologyreview.com/2020/12/11/101…
I released my first ever podcast episode in 2007. That's the same year the first iPhone came out. The same year I joined Twitter.
It's also the year Michael Wesch made this film on the semantics of the web, briefly advising we need to rethink ethics.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=6gmP4n…