If you are working in a project where you are hoping AI will get you better results, you should probably read this study.
"Twenty-eight African countries have blocked access to social media platforms in the past five years, 14 of these cases being election-related, says a study by Surfshark, a privacy protection company." x.com/webfoundation/âŠ
Brukar du falla för knepet att rösta med en reaktion?
NÀr du "röstar" skapar du förstÄs mer engagemang och synlighet för inlÀgget, vilket kan vara smart, lekfullt och kÀnnas ganska harmlöst.
Det gÀller dock att komma ihÄg att dessa enkÀter oftast inte alls Àr tillgÀngliga för personer som anvÀnder verktyg för syntolkning. Det innebÀr bland annat att en del personer pÄminns om att de Äterigen inte fÄr vara med och tycka till, för de ser inte frÄgan eller svarsalternativen. TyvÀrr har LinkedIn en tuff begrÀnsning i antal tecken för beskrivning av bilder, sÄ all text för att beskriva en sÄdan bild fÄr sÀllan plats.
Men om man verkligen inte vill anvÀnda den "poll"-funktion som LinkedIn redan har, sÄ kan man skriva direkt i inlÀgget, som jag gör nedan.
SYNTOLKNING
Bild med en frÄga som man kan rösta pÄ genom att vÀlja en emoji som svar.
FrÄgan Àr "Brukar du falla för knepet att rösta med en reaktion?"
Uttryck ditt svar med LinkedIns stöd för att reagera. Det hÀr betyder symbolerna för den hÀr frÄgan:
(Namn pÄ symbolerna Àr uppdaterade, se kommentar frÄn Adrian)
Fira: "Aldrig"
Skicka kÀrlek: "Alltid"
Insiktsfullt: "Att anvĂ€nda âpollâ-funktionen vore förstĂ„s bĂ€ttre."
Nyfiken: "Försök inte skamma, jag bestÀmmer
vÀl sjÀlv"
Gilla: "Jag förstÄr inte dessa, bara gillar fort"
âȘ Replying to @JesperBylund
@JesperBylund @ArchieComics And in the sense that people argue that there would become different classes of people (those with and without a âpassportâ) I tend to rely on reasonings around proportionality. When it comes to saving lives, that can require proportionally more restrictive regulations.
@JesperBylund @ArchieComics All this requires risk analysis and actions to mitigate risk, certainly in the form of communication and information. And especially in cases where people actually arenât able to get a vaccine.
So, as always: it depends on context and the safety regulations in place. :)
âȘ Replying to @JesperBylund
@JesperBylund @ArchieComics I think I like how Zuboff differentiates between capitalism and surveillance capitalism. So more that itâs a different version of capitalism that has risen from the insight that data about people is valuable for trade.
But I get you, I could have written just surveillance ;)
@JesperBylund @ArchieComics Vaccine passports are interesting. I had a vaccine passport most of my childhood (yellow card when travelling in Africa) so itâs not the concept of a âpassportâ itself that I likely would object to (Iâm not finished with this reasoning but happy to spitball).
@JesperBylund @ArchieComics The dilemma is, as often when it comes to digital, is vulnerability of data and storage, and potential recklessness in handling, as well as power of access to information. Do I choose to share my information in specific situations or do others "pull it" or is it harvested.
@JesperBylund @ArchieComics But I do actually believe digital can be a huge benefit in terms of vaccination insights and potentially save many lives. Registers of vaccinations have failed to a large extent in the past, where people have very little recollection of when and what vaccines they have taken,
This @ArchieComics strip from February 1997 predicted surveillance capitalism as much as online schooling in 2021.
"Video monitor must remain uncovered at all times." and that overseeing eye!
âȘ Replying to @TheMickNY
@TheMickNY I'm more of a single malt person, but circumstances make the experience đ
As fate would have it, I am this evening having whiskey and cola by a bonfire with three builders from Poland. And it's excellent.
Unpredictable events can be some of the most memorable. A power outage contributed to this one.
We are now into conspiracy theories. But this is where there is knowledge to be found. Listen to the voices of the ignored, they see things you do not.
Context: Only one of us speaks both languages and it's not me. đŹ
âȘ Replying to @Grinblo
@Grinblo Wow. đŹ Yeah no actually I think I really mean just that, people generally being lousy at pointing out stuff in your teeth for example. đ Think I did a whole talk with a bit of spinach once.
âȘ Replying to @Grinblo
@Grinblo đŹ You'd hope other attendees let you know. Like having something in your teeth.
This is the study: futurity.org/zoom-fatigue-vâŠ
Ăr du övervakad pĂ„ jobbet? Om ja, vilka verktyg/system anvĂ€nds och med vilken motivering?
FrÄgan Àr Àven relevant för dig som kÀnner dig övervakad utan att det uttalat handlar om övervakning. Eller som Àr övervakad utan att arbetsgivaren ens reflekterar över det.
Om du vill svara anonymt, kan du göra det hÀr. https://form.jotform.com/210743295065354
Eller om du hellre vill mejla: per@axbom.se
âȘ Replying to @mocapmarc
@mocapmarc Nice! Which platform has this?
Ever since I read that article about how absurd it is to look at yourself all day in meetings, I absolutely detest the window showing my own video. Now I hate how aware I am of how bad the video meeting interfaces are for wellbeing.
I had to check if it was April 1st, but no. The Telegraph plans to link journalist's pay with article popularity. Just not... yet.
In The Elements of Digital Ethics we are touching on: Attention Economy, Rule of Quantity and Lack of Ethical Ownership.
theguardian.com/media/2021/marâŠ
âȘ Replying to @JesperBylund
@JesperBylund @BrettFrischmann @sciam From what I understand it wasn't being opposed to all technological change, but being upset about exploitatitive technology that impaired people's wellbeing and made them worse off. Violence is a bad path, but the term is today rarely used to describe people who use violence.
@JesperBylund @BrettFrischmann @sciam But again, this has made me really interested to learn more about what really went down in the 17 and 1800s. If possible...
âȘ Replying to @JesperBylund
@JesperBylund @BrettFrischmann @sciam I need to find a good source on Luddites and the history. I hadn't thought that calling someone a Luddite was accusing them of adhering to an extremist ideology. Online texts appear very diverse in how they interpret the history both of the word and the movement's members.
There's Nothing Wrong with Being a Luddite, by @BrettFrischmann
"It enables critical reflection and evaluation of the technological world weâre building."
On @sciam:
blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/tâŠ
On the delusions of Empire laid bare by Meghan and Harry. Article by @gathara in the latest issue of @thecontinent_ pp. 10-11:
bucket.mg.co.za/wp-media/fe6d6âŠ
Nyheter i Clubhouse.
APP-UPPDATERINGAR den 12 MARS för beta-testare (alla som anvÀnder appen just nu):
⹠Det Àr nu möjligt att bjuda in genom att skriva in telefonnummer, och man behöver inte dela sin adressbok.
⹠Man kan dela lÀnkar till profiler och klubbar.
Till exempel:
âą Clubhouse-profil: https://www.joinclubhouse.com/@axbom
âą Digital Ethics (club in English): https://www.joinclubhouse.com/club/digital-ethics
⹠Digital Etik (klubb pÄ svenska): https://www.joinclubhouse.com/club/digital-etik
⹠SprÄkfiltrering. Appen försöker förstÄ vilka sprÄk man föredrar och primÀrt visa rum pÄ dessa sprÄk. Jag tycker förstÄs det vore bÀttre om jag fick tala om det sjÀlv.
⹠Knappen "Report for trolling" Àr omdöpt till "Report for disruptive behavior". Trolling var mycket riktigt för vagt. Man sÀger ocksÄ att man förbÀttrat automatiserade sÀtt att upptÀcka oönskade beteenden.
⹠Du kan nu deaktivera ditt konto direkt frÄn appen. Oklart dock om deaktivera och radera (som GDPR vill att man gör lÀtt) Àr samma sak.
⹠Om man bjuder in nÄgon till en grupp (som inte har Clubhouse sedan innan) sÄ kommer gruppens namn vara det som indikerar hur personen kom in i Clubhouse, pÄ deras profil.