@carnegarden Viktigt i vardagen! Delade familjekonton blir absolut en viktig grej. Tack för bra perspektiv!
Posts in English
A bit too many networks and platforms again. This is the one I have ignored the most.
What would you consider are the benefits of Bluesky?
Certainly not the level of engagement.
Zero responses in a month and a half… 😂 I believe that's the worst I've seen since 2004.
@mothninja Tack. Och din pappa låter som någon som det skulle vara värdefullt att intervjua i samband med ett sån't här projekt. 😊
@marcusosterberg Bra perspektiv. Tack. Själv står jag som ett fån och försöker betala med appen på Espresso House nästan varje vecka. Jag har lärt mig att vifta med den lediga handen för att starta skannern, och att höja ljusstyrkan på skärmen, men idag gick det till exempel inte ändå. När jag rörde telefonen sakta framåt och bakåt, och till slut jättenära, gick det till slut. Suuupersmiiiidigt. 😅
@daniel Skriver upp det. 😁
@ambivalena Tack. Ska skynda mig så gott jag kan, men denna jul blir det inte, haha.
@AasaMariaHedberg
Bra poäng. I grund och botten är de ju ett smart sätt att komma ihåg saker åt användare ("hej, alla varor i din varukorg ligger kvar"). Problemet blir först när de används för att komma ihåg saker åt företagen ("du la tydligen ett graviditetstest i din varukorg, jag delar det automatiskt med alla andra företag som vill sälja saker till dig").
Så det är svårt att vara 100 procent för eller emot tycker jag. Ganska vanligt det där, att vi riktar misstron mot tekniken när det egentligen är andra människor som gör saker mot oss. De lyckas nog bara gömma sig väldigt bra bakom tekniken.
Ibland låter det som att vi reglerar själva tekniken, men egentligen reglerar vi förstås vad människor får göra med tekniken. Vad bra du fick mig att tänka till. 😊
Nästa år vill jag skriva en bok. Den ska handla om hur man som vanlig människa ska hantera all teknik man har omkring sig. Lösenord, sms, e-legitimation, digitala formulär, fotodelning, kakor, prenumerationer och allt annat du kommer att tänka på i samband med det.
På ett enkelt språk så att alla får en chans att förstå och möjlighet ta tillbaka lite av den kontroll som tagits från dem.
Du läste det här först.
Och nu har jag sagt det så nu får det bli så.
Boken ska få heta Tekniktrygg.
Organisations love being "data-driven" but hate spending time on quality documentation. 🤷🏻
@carl Herrej---- ! Kunde ha gått hur illa som helst ju.
Most predictions are wrong, and certainly most of the ones quoted in the financial pages of prestigious newspapers.
So don’t be afraid to make your own.
Here are mine for 2024:
– The definition of what AI is will continue to be an elusive, confusing muddle.
– Unrealistic promises of the technology will fail to materialise and trust will diminish.
– Thousands of AI startups will go belly-up.
– Musk will promise 100% full self-driving by 2025 (it’s an Earth tradition for him to push it one year every year).
– There will be more deaths by ”self-driving cars”.
– There will be advances in healthcare, transport, architecture, farming and robotics using machine learning, but this will have nothing to do with language models.
– A multitude of ongoing court cases will rule in favor of copyright holders, essentially placing a cease-and-desist on many language models.
– In a televised interview Sam Altman vill admit that while language models serve a purpose in writing reports and code faster, they are not the way forward for wicked problem-solving and autonomous intelligence.
– Research will show that school students’ capacity for creative problem solving has regressed with an increase in their use of language models..
I think most of ”The Big AI Crash of 2024” will start happening in June.
Now, what’s your prediction? 😁
«"There is nothing 'transformative' about using The Times's content without payment to create products that substitute for The Times and steal audiences away from it," Times lawyers wrote in the suit on Wednesday.»
«The suit seeks to hold OpenAl and Microsoft responsible for the "billions of dollars in statutory and actual damages that they owe for the unlawful copying and use" of the Times' articles. In addition, the Times' legal team is asking a court to order the destruction of all large language model datasets, including ChatGPT, that rely on the publication's copyrighted works.»
«Lawyers for the paper wrote in the suit: "Users who ask a search engine what The Times has written on a subject should be provided with neither an unauthorized copy nor an inaccurate forgery of a Times article."»
https://www.npr.org/2023/12/27/1221821750/new-york-times-sues-chatgpt-openai-microsoft-for-copyright-infringement
If you need a Christmas movie tip that is actually entertaining, I really liked Your Christmas or Mine?
https://www.justwatch.com/se/film/your-christmas-or-mine
@Mabande
Good example. I'm also thinking of the recent Sports Illustrated revelations:
https://futurism.com/sports-illustrated-ai-generated-writers-excuse
And the conference that had fake female speakers:
https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/devternity-fake-speakers/
@laescude @Beantin @funnygodmother
I do appreciate how having a hard-to-pronounce name (for English-speakers) has turned out to be a privacy benefit. 😅
The dystopian world of an entirely AI-generated newsroom means that privileged men can continue to own and control everything but still give the appearance of diversity.
"News anchors" can be of all ages and backgrounds, and there can be 50% women presenting. The men in control can of course also give each woman exactly "the personality they want" and decide what they wear.
The men will definitely be applauded for their diversity efforts.
When I say in my talks that much of this forward motion is sending us back in time, this is the type of "innovation" I am referring to.
The dystopian world of an entirely AI-generated newsroom means that privileged men can continue to own and control everything but still give the appearance of diversity.
"News anchors" can be of all ages and backgrounds, and there can be 50% women presenting. The men in control can of course also give each woman exactly "the personality they want" and decide what they wear.
The men will definitely be applauded for their diversity efforts.
When I say in my talks that much of this forward motion is bringing us back in time, this is the type of "innovation" I am referring to.
@tsvenson Sounds like pure bliss!!
@fedijedi The funny thing is I can't remember what I was going to write. So all bets are welcome.