Per Axbom

Getting real about technology…

Stockholm, Sweden

Per Axbom Twitter

1. Noticed that Facebook are updating their terms on October 1. They mention section 3.2: “What you can share and do on Facebook”. So I assumed it has to do with removing harmful content within the context of current criticism.

I did a text comparison.

2. As it turns out, this line is added:

“We also can remove or restrict access to your content, services or information if we determine that doing so is reasonably necessary to avoid or mitigate adverse legal or regulatory impacts to Facebook.”

That’s it. That’s the change.

3. Translation: if it risks affecting Facebook negatively, they can remove or restrict access to your content.

I read this as: It’s not about you or the wellbeing of others, it’s about us and our ability to do as we like with your content to avoid litigation and _regulation_…

4. The primary thing that surprises me is that this was not in there already…

5. Here is a link to the new terms if you want to have look yourself: facebook.com/legal/terms/pr…

And the current terms:
facebook.com/legal/terms

🔗 Originally posted on Twitter

Per Axbom Twitter

After years spent as a CIA analyst, diplomat and national security advisor at the White House, Yaël Eisenstat began to view the breakdown of civil discourse as the biggest threat to US democracy. x.com/YaelEisenstat/…

“We’re being manipulated by the current information ecosystems entrenching so many of us so far into absolutism, that compromise has become a dirty word.” x.com/YaelEisenstat/…

“There is no incentive to help people slow down, to build in enough friction that people have to stop recognise their emotional reaction to something and question their own assumptions before engaging.”

follow @YaelEisenstat x.com/YaelEisenstat/…

🔗 Originally posted on Twitter