↪ Replying to @mattberan
@mattberan Ah, that's neat. In essence that becomes an information of their presence as well.
Per Axbom
↪ Replying to @unknown
@carlheath Thanks for the example. I've seen a faraday box in a client office but never had to use one.
Have you experienced any info/signage in people's homes regarding common audio/video recording devices? Alternatively, have you experienced anyone refusing to visit another person's home without guarantees of disconnected devices/microphones?
Interested in new friction...
↪ Replying to @BlackGirlNerds
@BlackGirlNerds Thank you, I love these reviews!
Wisdom from Alastair twitter.com/acuity_design/status/1…
One of the things I love about having blogged for a long time is revisiting texts and seeing how little in fact changes over time. And how certain things do change a lot.
I wrote this in 2005 on a topic that would likely fall under "UX Writing" today.
axbom.com/create-a-web-t…
Recommended research. Talk to each member on an Agile development team individually, and ask them what Agile methodology is and means. Take note of varying perspectives, hesitancy and what is left out. Those differences will unlock important insights. Guaranteed.
↪ Replying to @xt1
@xt1 Ha! Excellent, thank you!
@xt1 This part though: "In ordinary life, if somebody consistently exaggerates or lies to you, you soon discount everything they say."
I know a former president who demonstrates the opposite to be true. I'm now thinking though that distance between sender and receiver is significant.
↪ Replying to @andreas_pson
@andreas_pson @Landgren Håller med. I den bästa av världar :)
x.com/axbom/status/1…
↪ Replying to @andreas_pson
@andreas_pson @Landgren Assistenter till personer som vill ha, eller behöver, det utskrivet. 🧐
@andreas_pson @Landgren Det är dock förstås för att man inte byggt det utskriftsvänligt, och inte tänkt på tillgänglighet, från början.
In ALL news stories I've read that I've had deep insight and prior knowledge of, the articles - while mostly true - have contained errors and misleading information.
It's healthy to read all articles with this in mind: "which part is true and which part is misleading?"
Different perspectives
1) Platforms assume what people want to see based on experiments invisible to the people being experimented on.
2) Platforms tell people what assumptions they are making.
3) Platforms ask people to contribute consciously to decisions about what they see.
4) People are in actual control over what they see.
5) People control what they see and do so with their own wellbeing in mind.
6) People control what they share and do so with others’ wellbeing in mind.
7) People can choose one platform and communicate at will with another.
↪ Replying to @Landgren
@Landgren Ridå.
@Landgren Vet inte om man vågar “försätta använda sidan”?
Om man bestämmer sig för att “försätta” använda sidan så godkänner man deras “cookie policy”.
Någon får gärna hjälpa mig att lokalisera denna cookie policy som man godkänner…
↪ Replying to @unknown
@heather_ia @ballantine70 @chrisweston @WB40Podcast @AbilityNet @simonminty Thanks Heather! And a good reminder to finalize the next iteration...
x.com/axbom/status/1…
Frances Haugen just lost a ton of credibility in a swift move of arguing that encryption is bad and Facebook needs to be able to read everyone's message to protect them. 🤔 x.com/AlecMuffett/st…
From this article: telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/10/2…
Forgot to follow up on this. Haugen says she was misrepresented in the Telegraph article. She fully supports “e2e open source encryption software” and uses it herself on a daily basis. What she was questioning was Facebook’s claim of e2e encryption.
techcrunch.com/2021/10/25/fac…
Always very moved by stories like this.
Stop. Listen. See yourself in someone else. x.com/DohaDebates/st…
Just got this huge craving to rewatch V.
Weird.
Now I have to figure out where I can watch it.
