Tagged: Twitter

Per Axbom Twitter

I want to believe that everything in this poster ad was on purpose, and a nod to Sweden...

Non-Marvel people: Knull is a villain and deity responsible for the destruction and corruption of entire civilizations across the universe.

villains.fandom.com/wiki/Knull x.com/axbom/status/1…

We've got @TheLocalSweden coming to the rescue and explaining the Swedish word "knull".

thelocal.se/20200702/swedi…

🔗 Originally posted on Twitter

Per Axbom Twitter

The novel Flowers for Algernon had a profound impact on me when I read it in school, more than 30 years ago. It gave me important perspectives on ableism and prejudice. It nurtured my compassion. Made me cry.

I was sadly unaware of how many US schools have banned it.

Flowers for Algernon was number 43 on the American Library Association's list of the 100 Most Frequently Challenged Books of 1990-1999.

I found this upsetting. But it reminded me to talk about the book more. And make a note to re-read it.

🔗 Originally posted on Twitter

Per Axbom reply Twitter

↪ Replying to @JesperBylund

@JesperBylund @snopes Agree about separating facts and morals. In that wording I meant that 'fact-based' _sounds_ like the moral path.

I like your reference to perspective-based. I'm closing in on connotations like honest, transparent and reflective. These make more sense.

@JesperBylund @snopes Also, this conversation reminds me why I fell in love with social media back in the day. The possibility for conversation around posts.

I feel like the conversations are drowning but I should be more intent on nurturing them.

🔗 Originally posted on Twitter

Per Axbom reply Twitter

↪ Replying to @JesperBylund

@JesperBylund @snopes Agree. This is a good thing. As an example, advertisers pulling out of FB for some reason:

* They are acting on moral values.
* They found a perfect time for "ethics-washing" because nobody is buying anything now and ads make no sense.
* Peer pressure.

These are the narratives.

@JesperBylund @snopes For me then, fact-based reporting would be based on the fact that advertisers are pulling out, but also be open to the many reasons this is happening. Or at least reporting company statements as narratives and not as truth. I see different journos do this better or worse.

@JesperBylund @snopes But yes, stating any of the narratives as fact would be wrong. As would be not following up on whether they actually do pull out.

🔗 Originally posted on Twitter

Per Axbom Twitter

First imagine how easy it would be for misinformation to spread without FB and Twitter.

Then imagine how easy it would be for fact-based reporting to spread without FB and Twitter.

It's of course not as easy as that, but I found it an interesting thought experiment.

My reflections around this always end up in reasonings around friction.

We need friction. Friction makes us think. Friction helps us question our choices, so that we may make better ones.

But right now many are drowning in passivity, egotism, and pleasure. In a sea of irrelevance.

Huxley likely had it more right than Orwell.

But no, we're not all the way there yet.

highexistence.com/amusing-oursel…

🔗 Originally posted on Twitter