↪ Replying to @MotaniDom
@MotaniDom Great. Sorry I missed your tweet earlier. @EAStarWars
Tagged: reply
↪ Replying to @MotaniDom
@MotaniDom Did you get it working yet? @EAStarWars
↪ Replying to @EAStarWars
@EAStarWars It’s working now! Don’t know what did it, but I’ve got a happy son now :) Thanks.
↪ Replying to @EAStarWars
@EAStarWars Can’t find a download option for Battlefront :/ (but thanks for your quick help on this)
↪ Replying to @EAStarWars
@EAStarWars nope, deleted everything (also a tip from the forums…)
↪ Replying to @EAStarWars
@EAStarWars done that. been going through all the forums. :/
↪ Replying to @unknown
@AndyLeandy Good question! A bit of both I think.
↪ Replying to @jnd1er
@jnd1er Haha, you blow my mind =) The last time I interviewed you, you gave me your fax number. And I was extremely nervous ;) @uxpodcast
@jnd1er I'll be in touch before end of year :) Would be fantastic to schedule something in January. @uxpodcast
↪ Replying to @beantin
@beantin No vote, we’re bringing him on. Q1 2016 ;)
↪ Replying to @petetrainor
@petetrainor @WIRED Which of course supports exactly what you’re saying.
↪ Replying to @petetrainor
@petetrainor @WIRED My hypothesis: People want the real story of what they’re clicking on, and that beats click-baits. #neeedsmoredata
↪ Replying to @petetrainor
@petetrainor @WIRED Clicks on these links were higher(!) than when the click-bait links were not summarized in ‘real story’.
↪ Replying to @petetrainor
@petetrainor @WIRED Interesting non-scientific experiment my friend did: started tweeting click-bait links along with the real story.