↪ Replying to @DesignAThought
@DesignAThought Snyggt, tack. Ska läsa på mer om det.
Tagged: reply
↪ Replying to @DesignAThought
@DesignAThought Det alla föreslagna begrepp saknar tycker jag är den starka drivkraften att hjälpa / göra skillnad greatergood.berkeley.edu/topic/compassi…
↪ Replying to @MartinWicklin
@MartinWicklin Det är så sjukt bra så man börjar gråta över hela tillståndet. Ingen kan komma efter det här =) Jag hade gissat Tina Fey :D
↪ Replying to @MartinWicklin
@MartinWicklin Haha, vi måste titta på nästan synkade flöden =)
↪ Replying to @ojmqd
@OJQD @beantin We’ll save that one for our memoirs ;)
↪ Replying to @clartem
@clartem Who doesn't want to play around with bots! ;) Native app is a good reason, though.
↪ Replying to @danrhealy
@danrhealy Sometimes I feel like writing an essay on the benefits of the 7-point scale :) @uxpodcast
↪ Replying to @petetrainor
@petetrainor I don’t disagree, but I think “app” is too limiting when referring to it in the design community. @chrisnoessel @nireyal
↪ Replying to @petetrainor
@petetrainor haha, touché. as an umbrella term it encompasses more types of solutions was my thinking @chrisnoessel @nireyal
↪ Replying to @unknown
@barbiche Very true. Glad you caught ny tweet, I was about to ping you. Been thinking about yours for days ;)
↪ Replying to @matsbjork
@matsbjork :) I was thinking more of the ‘traditional’ codes but this is really cool!
↪ Replying to @PierreDuRietz
@PierreDuRietz mmm, kanske måste raka bröstet också 😜 @beantin
↪ Replying to @beantin
@beantin I’m not sure. But I have seriously been considering it. Don’t want to become that combover guy… :D