↪ Replying to @unknown
@m8rt @setapp It's an app I hadn't considered but would be fun to play with.
Tagged: reply
↪ Replying to @rebelytics
@rebelytics As many as you want, as long as you are always doing 80% on the task on the post-it. 😄 (so I guess it depends)
↪ Replying to @MollyWattTalks
@MollyWattTalks Awesome. And I can understand about Isabella. Are you speaking here?
↪ Replying to @charliekirk11
@charliekirk11 These pictures are FROM the media. Is this an ironic tweet or have you just crossed over into The Twilight Zone?
↪ Replying to @Tobbe_Ryber
@Tobbe_Ryber Jag tycker inte att man SKA vara det däremot tror jag inte man kan förneka att de finns.
@Tobbe_Ryber Conor skriver ju egentligen bara om hur de satt upp sin gruppering och menar att det fungerar.
@Tobbe_Ryber Sedan om de här människorna verkligen är så kompetenta inom alla områden som beskrivs är ju svårt att veta.
@Tobbe_Ryber Eller så är helt enkelt många UX designers redan det som andra väljer att kalla unicorns.
↪ Replying to @palu1161
@palu1161 Haha, liten 'Freudian slip' av Facebook. "Användarupplevelse" är väl knappast ett ord man bör använda gentemot sin målgrupp.
@palu1161 Varför skrev de inte bara "positiv upplevelse" tänker jag.
↪ Replying to @beantin
@beantin Absolutely. Which would be fair. But in that scenario it's easier for non-techie people to make a conscious decision.
↪ Replying to @danrhealy
@danrhealy @UXMuch @nickf @uxpodcast Could be!
↪ Replying to @danrhealy
@danrhealy @UXMuch @nickf Yes, and in too many companies UX is brought in when the product is already defined, which can set us up for failure as a profession 😬
@danrhealy @UXMuch @nickf Poor Nick when he wakes up to this thread 😂 I've thoroughly enjoyed it though.
↪ Replying to @UXMuch
@UXMuch @danrhealy @nickf My interpretation was that users had offered this information without this question being asked :)
@UXMuch @danrhealy @nickf But yes, if I had a nickel for every person who said "I won't use this" when the iPad launched...
↪ Replying to @danrhealy
@danrhealy @UXMuch @nickf Hence the 'scissors' in Nick's original tweet I think 😛
↪ Replying to @danrhealy
@danrhealy @UXMuch @nickf Interesting, and then what happened? Design scrapped, back to research?
↪ Replying to @danrhealy
@danrhealy @nickf @UXMuch Testing will show task completion success, rarely goal fulfillment. That tends to take longer in my experience. Plus, you are...
@danrhealy @nickf @UXMuch ...testing you solution, not the validity of what problem you are solving.
@danrhealy @nickf @UXMuch Saying this without being familiar with the Sprint book approach 😂
↪ Replying to @unknown
@Eduardo_Rich Actually I fully understand them. The more I saw it yesterday the more uncomfortable I felt. As @beantin said, good learning moment though.
↪ Replying to @danrhealy
@danrhealy @nickf @UXMuch My interpretation: it's dangerous to design the wrong thing in the right way. Doing it faster amplifies the harm.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@Eduardo_Rich My question is why they're not all now suscribers 😛
↪ Replying to @unknown
@Eduardo_Rich I trust you forwarded it to all coworkers.