↪ Replying to @inkblurt
@inkblurt Hmm... version 2.0 for Unix was released on the 10th. Version 0.5 was released in January of the same year. Version 1.0 for Windows was released today (11th) 25 years ago. To be absolutely correct 😘
↪ Replying to @inkblurt
@inkblurt Hmm... version 2.0 for Unix was released on the 10th. Version 0.5 was released in January of the same year. Version 1.0 for Windows was released today (11th) 25 years ago. To be absolutely correct 😘
↪ Replying to @stranger_sins
@Iam_Curtis Fast inte ”på Twitter”, känner jag. Jag har jättemånga diskussioner på Twitter utan påhopp och onödiga konfrontationer. Det här är för mig hur jag kan se ”moderna” politiker prata oavsett kanal.
@Iam_Curtis Men jag kan nog köpa att våra sätt att kommunicera över Internet har bidragit till polariseringen som sedan smittar av sig i vardaglig diskurs.
↪ Replying to @thehybridself
@thehybridself Kollar den också men har inte riktigt fastnat. Inte jättenöjd med skådespelar-insatserna.
@thehybridself Den här var bra dock :) newyorker.com/culture/cultur…
↪ Replying to @unknown
@Skogberg Because of you I will never sleep again.
↪ Replying to @asaplsnr
@asaplsnr Som andra säger är det meta-taggarna för Twitter cards som avgör detta. Innan jag lägger ut något från egna sajter använder jag alltid deras validator för att kolla att bild och text blir rätt: cards-dev.twitter.com/validator
↪ Replying to @unknown
@Bakjour @jessicaschedvin "alla här på twitter" — Vad betyder det ens? 😂
↪ Replying to @unknown
@steveportigal 😝
@steveportigal I've been recommending your books today btw. I also started to set up a KIT recommenantion list for Listening: kit.com/axbom/listening
↪ Replying to @chris_mortimer
@chris_mortimer Love that you picked up on the shake 😂
↪ Replying to @cydharrell
@cydharrell The Outline is such a good magazine. I keep forgetting about it because I don’t think there’s a way to subscribe? @outline
↪ Replying to @SarahHGlanville
@SarahHGlanville 😂 This made my morning brighter, thank you!
↪ Replying to @hareemmannan
@HareemMannan @amcasari @dqpdang @anildash @nickf This made me think of 25 years ago when I tipped off the news anonymously about hazing at my boarding school. The situation hit the news, 3 students were expelled, but leadership stayed put (although of course they knew what was going on). 🙁
@HareemMannan @amcasari @dqpdang @anildash @nickf Hazing is a bad word (what some call initiation ceremonies or bastardisation). It’s really systemic harassment and abuse.
↪ Replying to @dqpdang
@dqpdang @anildash @HareemMannan @amcasari @nickf I believe @amcasari outlined a good approach here, stressing the importance of not doing it alone. I encourage teams to have discussions around ”What in our organization is preventing us from making ethical choices?” which doesn’t have to be confrontational.
@dqpdang @anildash @HareemMannan @amcasari @nickf Then I agree that impact assessments (a form of risk analysis) should be a regular activity in development work. And finally, to feel empowered to speak up, engage in pre-scripting (as advocated by Mary Gentile in Giving Voice to Values):
@dqpdang @anildash @HareemMannan @amcasari @nickf This involves practicing speaking up before the confrontation happens. Something that is certainly easier when you have your allies and your team on the same page (hopefully achieved during impact assessment).
@dqpdang @anildash @HareemMannan @amcasari @nickf Of course, much of this is hard without real self-awareness; who am I, what do I want to stand for and do my actions align with my values. It also doesn’t solve when we don’t see the harm coming although...
@dqpdang @anildash @HareemMannan @amcasari @nickf ...I’m certain we can do a better job of anticipating that harm will happen, maybe just not what.
@dqpdang @anildash @HareemMannan @amcasari @nickf Reading Anil’s original question, ”that you thought MIGHT cause harm”, the first step would certainly be the impact assessment - to help understand how others think around the same issue.
↪ Replying to @janeruffino
@janeruffino @letterpress_se @SthlmXperience I was complaining about the Mercator projection but also showing this straight line (the longest you can sail in a straight line without hitting land).

↪ Replying to @bratwurstkomet
@bratwurstkomet @WIAD_Zuerich I’m excited to be going!
↪ Replying to @baekdal
@baekdal Also, it's a hoax ;) hoaxsearch.com/pre-cracked-eg…
↪ Replying to @berkun
@berkun That would be even more spectacular! It’s weird, I’m confident I used to have the screen dump of an article with the exact wording that I used on this slide, but that article doesn’t seem to be online anymore.
↪ Replying to @berkun
@berkun It’s one of those ”truths” that is often quoted at conversion conferences. Here is one example: marketingdive.com/news/google-53…
My point with the slide is really that the interpretation of the data can be framed in different ways.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@kajsahartig @letterpress_se @SthlmXperience Vassego :)