Tagged: reply
↪ Replying to @JesperBylund
@JesperBylund My best way of documenting (in that people actually reference it) has been a demo slideshow preso every 3 weeks and the video recording of the same, including QA sessions with the stakeholders. Part of the demo has naturally been to explain the reasoning behind design decisions.
↪ Replying to @katherinemzhou
@katherinemzhou Yes, I am impressed by the many puns and punchlines he packs into his footnotes 😁
↪ Replying to @IchimusaiSWE
@IchimusaiSWE Yes! I haven’t read it but will add it to my list.
↪ Replying to @amrancz
@amrancz Agree, that’s why I worded the question with ”feel like”. It’s not data I can really use for anything of course, but enforces my thinking that we are doing something wrong, or being subjected to something wrong, and people are willing to be open about it. I want to learn more.
↪ Replying to @tsvenson
@tsvenson I appreciate the idea of helping others as a way of helping yourself. Thank you for sharing!
↪ Replying to @tsvenson
@tsvenson Sounds hopeful it’s moving in the right direction. Are you doing something different?
↪ Replying to @unknown
@Acuity_Design Nice. Friction is my tool of choice, as you know. :) Depth of threshold is a neat way of looking at it.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@Acuity_Design Wow, that is surprising. As the Vox article mentions it also receives no scrutiny from Malcolm Gladwell (Blink). Not as surprising, but dangerous. The lack of connection to actual behavior is what what gets me worried about its supposed message.
@Acuity_Design And of course, the irony in all the bias required to set up the test and draw these conclusions from it...
↪ Replying to @anymalooney
@anymalooney I believe guidelines are only guidelines. They’re there to help you think before jumping to conclusions, but they are not rigid. We are all different.
↪ Replying to @movito
@movito @Cennydd Fair point. I don’t have a straightforward answer but my own take being this has to do with violence against, and expulsion of, the unwanted. The hyenas in this case.
@movito @Cennydd There was also this Swedish opinion piece in 2016. aftonbladet.se/nyheter/kolumn…
↪ Replying to @asaplsnr
@asaplsnr Känner igen mig själv oerhört i detta.
Med det sagt har du läst The Future of Capitalism av Paul Collier? 😂
↪ Replying to @Cennydd
@Cennydd Dan Hassler-Forest makes this point well in The Washington Post.
washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/0…
@Cennydd Here’s a follow-up story without a paywall...
cbc.ca/radio/thecurre…
↪ Replying to @tsvenson
@tsvenson ”Sweden has let our African American Community down in the United States.”
Huh?
↪ Replying to @B2Bsalesandmkg
@B2Bsalesandmkg Yeah, this was a Swiss company calling from Spain to Sweden.
In my view, Ideally communication occurs according to preference, which means you learn preference first.
In free trial cases it's easy enough to ask people when, how and if they would like to be helped/contacted.
@B2Bsalesandmkg But I'm not saying it's not going to bring them more sales; all I'm saying it puts me off. 😊
↪ Replying to @DangerousDolly
@DangerousDolly Absolut. Både tänkt och gjort :) och vill skriva fler. 11 januari 2018, så inte gammalt.
Jag kan tänka mig att roman-spåret stämmer. Jag har lekt med inledningar förut.