↪ Replying to @unknown
@mattlburgess Agree full-heartedly. Don't know if you've seen my article on DR Congo?
ethical.net/technology/the…
↪ Replying to @unknown
@mattlburgess Agree full-heartedly. Don't know if you've seen my article on DR Congo?
ethical.net/technology/the…
↪ Replying to @Wildenstam
@Wildenstam True, far from all of these will be of Swedish origin, but at least commonly used in Swedish. 😊
↪ Replying to @DorotheaBaur
@DorotheaBaur I'd love a thread of idioms pertaining only to cows. 😁🐮
↪ Replying to @MzansiMaasai
@MzansiMaasai @white_owly Ha, I actually researched this! The Prussian blue color became financially viable for less well-off people in the early 19th century. All the finest furniture (used to store linen, porcelain and silver) was painted in this blue. Defecating in it would be the worst possible thing.
↪ Replying to @white_owly
@white_owly Added to thread, with explanation :)
x.com/axbom/status/1…
↪ Replying to @neeraj
@neeraj Thanks! 😊 I felt it did really capture my state of mind.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@kateheydonorg Lovely environment! I started cycling to work last year. It was such a great way to start and end the day. Then came winter followed by corona.
↪ Replying to @amrancz
@amrancz I try to embrace it. It means that you take time to reflect and reason – which is a good thing. It can also mean you are _gaining_ expertise and proficiency, as "the more you know, the more you know you don't know".
↪ Replying to @uxmastery
@uxmastery Awesome, would love a list of those more than 200 countries ;)

@uxmastery x.com/stevenjlovelac…
↪ Replying to @hankvonhelvete
@hankvonhelvete I agree. In the true sense of what these words mean, scanning is reading. But in UX the myth of not reading for comprehension lives on...
↪ Replying to @unknown
@matthewdichter Yes, and popups, newsletters, cookie consents, ads, more microcopy...
↪ Replying to @unknown
@danachis @benadida Great thread. This is why Sweden's voting system is all based on paper ballots.
↪ Replying to @mjmetts
@mjmetts I was thinking of you and Andy when I wrote this tweet Michael! Glad you saw it :)
↪ Replying to @emanuelkarlsten
@emanuelkarlsten Jag håller med dig, det är inte missvisande i det här sammanhanget. Men om en yrkeskategori upplever att man drabbats i stor utsträckning (mycket sjukfrånvaro) så känns slutsatsen "inte särskilt drabbade" orättvis. Att man kan ha drabbats stort utan att det syns.
↪ Replying to @emanuelkarlsten
@emanuelkarlsten Inte om vissa yrkesgrupper har större andel i riskgrupp, som mer naturligt fått komma och testa sig. Eller har betydande större representation i de områden som drabbats än i mindre drabbade områden. Men det är ev. långsökt. Väldigt svårt att få klarhet i hursom. Tesen håller nog.
@emanuelkarlsten Det som skaver är nog "inte särskilt drabbade" - vilket man inte vet med säkerhet. Det är ju mer "inte mer drabbade än andra" som man är mer ute efter i studien.