↪ Replying to @unknown
@KGuw @linneahermansen @grishund Alltså hur kunde man inte veta detta. Och nu vet jag att husbonde och engelskans ‘husband’ har samma rötter. Galet.
Tagged: reply
↪ Replying to @DanWatersDesign
@DanWatersDesign Yes, I absolutely agree this is the sensible approach.
↪ Replying to @joenatoli
@joenatoli @DougCollinsUX To your good health @DougCollinsUX!
↪ Replying to @shaun_gomm
@shaun_gomm Thank you Shaun! That means a lot. 🙏
↪ Replying to @unknown
@Kyle_mitt_namn Den här i Kungsängen har kallats "en smurf på crack" i samband med inbjudan till panelsamtal om offentlig konst i Upplands-Bro. Verket heter Ping Pong: upplands-bro.se/nyheter-2021/2…
↪ Replying to @KarinmedK
@KarinmedK Det är Discovery+ appen du menar? Surt att det inte funkar!
↪ Replying to @KarinmedK
@KarinmedK Vänta nu, jag castade fotbollen till Chromecast idag?
↪ Replying to @JonnyExists
@JonnyTheDean @gurahamu89 @CynicalRainbows @Dayphorisms If you want long stretches of empty space the 23 hour bus/train ride from south of Sweden to North of Sweden is a good example :)
↪ Replying to @unknown
@steveportigal @cydharrell This is truly interesting. It had not occurred to me that people in the US would find it off-putting that the e-mail I send arrives outside "business hours". I'm gonna have to think this one through.
(8pm here right now)
↪ Replying to @JuliaHensley
@JuliaHensley One loop is a good rule. I like it.
↪ Replying to @tsvenson
@tsvenson Great setup! The variable then is not time, but dedication to relevance.
↪ Replying to @ifindkarma
@ifindkarma @ishyamo @jessicamalonso I was mostly referring to influence over behavior. But these are all good points. Facebook often emphasises "we do not sell your data" and then lets advertisers target vulnerable teenagers. But few ask if they *buy* data. Yael's thread in Jessica's follow-up tweet was also good.
↪ Replying to @ifindkarma
@ifindkarma @ishyamo @jessicamalonso Important to note that deleting a FB account
1) greatly reduces the amount of data points they can collect about you
2) reduces the platform's influence over your behavior 👀
3) reduces their overall power (more people outside will force companies to invest in other places)
@ifindkarma @ishyamo @jessicamalonso I agree we can not avoid being identified online by tech giants, but I believe it can be misleading to give the impression that the amount of data collection non-FB users are subjected to is anything near the amount of daily users. Also, the data collection is only part of it :)
↪ Replying to @eriksellstrom
@eriksellstrom Jag undrar alltid hur koordinerat sån't här kan vara. Man släpper nee några brandfacklor på väl valda ställen, men hur elden sprider sig känns oförutsägbart! Antingen så är det förutsägbart, eller så är det så billigt att göra om experimentet tills man får önskat resultat.
@eriksellstrom Har man tillräckligt många ställen att tända på förstås, ja då är ju effekten ett faktum.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@D20Nat1 This is true, and yet only a small percentage of people given this type of offer tend to agree to it. Which will also relate to who is being offered, how much time and effort is being requested in return, and who is offering.
↪ Replying to @ishyamo
@ishyamo Good Q. Generally I personally don't look for payment when assisting with research. For me it was just that Amazon was a deterrent in this case, as I realise how much will go there. But I do believe it's fair to reimburse people for their efforts, depending perhaps on context.
↪ Replying to @JaredFossey
@JaredFossey @JennyTheolin Love of missing out 😊