Tagged: reply
↪ Replying to @FMannerheim
@FMannerheim Det extroverta idealet är beklämmande.😔
axbom.se/tyst-i-klassen/
↪ Replying to @unknown
@weylandswart Oh yeah. PayPal. 😂
gawker.com/5325654/this-m…
↪ Replying to @unknown
@weylandswart This is true. It's just my tongue-in-cheek way of bringing to attention that Musk did not found Tesla; just made a deal to be able to use the founder title.
↪ Replying to @hypervisible
@hypervisible @dlberes «“The people inside Twitter want to understand how their algorithm works, too,” he said.»
I wish this insight was more broadly understood.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@Loukas_RS My pen wasn't tiny enough to draw the eyes. 😝
↪ Replying to @unknown
@Loukas_RS Hence the little person scratching their head on the right side of LinkedIn 😅
↪ Replying to @itsariot
@itsariot Oh, interesting. This makes me want to do some further digging. Thank you for making me aware.
↪ Replying to @jarango
@jarango @steveportigal @danachis I realised 😊. Threads are not always so clear on Twitter. In my head it was a continuation of the criticism I brought forward in the post.
↪ Replying to @jarango
@jarango @steveportigal @danachis It is also my experience that there’s long been a deep and misguided fascination with IQ, which is what I was hoping to illustrate. Here is another example:
”If you target a broad consumer audience, you will also have a higher IQ than your average user”
nngroup.com/articles/compu…
↪ Replying to @onsman
@onsman Fun fact, the Swedish name of my book is Digital omtanke where the word "omtanke" is compassion. But it can also be interpreted as the noun of the verb "tänka om" (rethink). Making the title also "Digital rethink". 😁
@onsman The English translator attempted an English version of this, using considerate and reconsider. Never made it to the cover, but I appreciated the effort.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@DonnaLanclos Haha, excellent point. I tend to more often use the word ’listening’ so I was kind of frustrated at first that I had sketched it out like this. My counterpoint would be that researchers too often assume they understand without putting more effort into truly understanding.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@StacyHolmstedt @nickf Damn, I didn't think of that! 😂 Well of course not, I don't have the capacity to think like that. 😮
↪ Replying to @PiSquare
@PiSquare They’ve been using variants of this ad since 2015.
↪ Replying to @karenmcgrane
@karenmcgrane Wild, Do you know if they reuse the same text every two years, or if they actually do recruit more often than the ad itself claims?
↪ Replying to @johncutlefish
@johncutlefish "created to draw users to a specific business and convince them to buy its products"
"The artificial intelligence (AI) profiles will send a message to a user and eventually connect them with a real telemarketer to continue the discussion."
etownian.com/main/news/toda…
@johncutlefish Of course, there are more reasons 😊
blog.jantegze.com/top-11-reasons…
↪ Replying to @HERO_Respondi
@HERO_Respondi Wow, thanks, this is a great writeup. Adding the show to my podcast queue.