Tagged: reply

Per Axbom reply Twitter

↪ Replying to @onsman

@onsman Fun fact, the Swedish name of my book is Digital omtanke where the word "omtanke" is compassion. But it can also be interpreted as the noun of the verb "tänka om" (rethink). Making the title also "Digital rethink". 😁

@onsman The English translator attempted an English version of this, using considerate and reconsider. Never made it to the cover, but I appreciated the effort.

🔗 Originally posted on Twitter

Per Axbom reply Twitter

↪ Replying to @johncutlefish

@johncutlefish "created to draw users to a specific business and convince them to buy its products"

"The artificial intelligence (AI) profiles will send a message to a user and eventually connect them with a real telemarketer to continue the discussion."

etownian.com/main/news/toda…

@johncutlefish Of course, there are more reasons 😊

blog.jantegze.com/top-11-reasons…

🔗 Originally posted on Twitter

Per Axbom reply Twitter

↪ Replying to @HERO_Respondi

@HERO_Respondi My take: One easily gets entrenched in blanket statements w/o defining what regulation is in focus and what we mean by innovation. If something stifles harmful innovation, I'm all for it :)

Play can certainly discover harm but one often needs regulation to be watchful of it.

@HERO_Respondi I think what I wrote on the Hippocratic Oath here relates to this:

axbom.com/first-design-n…

🔗 Originally posted on Twitter