Per Axbom Twitter

1. Ok, I'm sorry, you will soon become aware of another way to waste away your precious time. But it's so immensely satisfying you may actually thank me. Just maybe.

2. For many years I've been using a browser script called "Kick Ass". The idea is very simple: on any web page, yes ANY WEB PAGE, you can activate a space ship that can shoot and destroy all the bits of content on the page... text, images, and so on.

3. Sounds awesome, right!? And it so very much is. Here's a video of me shooting away on a @Telegraph page (with some added guidance for you).

4. Point of no return. Here is the link to add it to your browser. Now go work on your anger management issues and I'll see you in a couple of hours. (That big button you see that says "Launch Kick Ass" - just drag it to your bookmarks.) kickassapp.com

🔗 Originally posted on Twitter

Per Axbom reply Twitter

â†Ș Replying to @unknown

@jessicaivins I feel more creative. I make surprising and enlightening connections between what I’m reading and what’s going on in my personal and work life. Reading Frankenstein right now has inspired a blog post with new takes on ethics (in the works). I start new conversations at work.

@jessicaivins Reading fiction in bed before falling asleep also makes me sleep better, oddly enough.

@jessicaivins Here’s a reading tip. It’s very different from anything else I’ve read, and I imagine most people love or hate it. But there’s nothing hard about reading it =)

x.com/axbom/status/9


🔗 Originally posted on Twitter

Per Axbom Twitter

Up late proofreading Twitter’s official stance on how they approve of world leaders who attack and hate on others. ’night all.

#TwitterApprovesOfLeadersWhoHate
Link: blog.twitter.com/official/en_us


To sum up the points I’m making, Twitter’s stance is that they intend to *advance* global conversation. But if you do not consciously choose direction you are almost always supporting the direction of those who already have the strongest, most privileged, voices.

Twitter goes on to say that deleting [hateful] tweets will hide important information. Yet at the same time say that this will not silence the voice. So which one is it? Twitter is certainly capable of discussing topics that do not originate on the platform.

In a worrying display of doublespeak, Twitter then asserts that they are working hard to remain unbiased, after literally just saying that they are biased when it comes to how they value the tweets of leaders. They treat them according to political context.

This line also worries me: ”We are working to make Twitter the best place to see and freely discuss everything *that matters*.” (my emphasis). Obviously then Twitter have an idea of what matters, which puts a bit of a damper on the word ”freely”.

Missing from this announcement is any reference to Twitter’s own terms of use, the notion of suspending accounts (they only bring up deleting tweets), and the primary reason we are even having this discussion: Donald Trump. There is an elephant in the room that should be named.

Also there is a lot of ”we” and ”best” in the last paragraph that I could not avoid poking fun at. Very little said about the people the platform intends to support(?).

youtube.com/watch?v=vp1wdJ


Not to mention: x.com/histoftech/sta


As well as: x.com/developerjack/


🔗 Originally posted on Twitter