Per Axbom reply Twitter

â†Ș Replying to @grishund

@grishund 😂 SĂ„ klart det Ă€r. DĂ„ skulle "hoppade upp i luften" funka tycker jag.

"The dog bounded over the gate", Àr ju "hunden hoppade över grinden". SprÄng Àr ju ett roligare svenskt ord men kÀnns som man vill att huvudet ska ha ben för att kunna ta ett sprÄng.

@grishund FÄr mig nu att tÀnka pÄ en saga jag lÀste som liten dÀr det vÀxte ut tre ben pÄ en pannkaka och den hoppade ur stekpannan och sprang ut och nerför gatan...

🔗 Originally posted on Twitter

Per Axbom Twitter

One of my biggest beefs with the Swedish language is the lack of words to differentiate between efficient and effective.

Both these are regularly translated using the single word "effektiv".

Thus making it hard to differentiate "doing things right" and "doing the right thing".

The importance of this distinction truly illustrates how language can be a barrier to advancement. And boy, does language stand in the way of equality, but that's another story.

(yes, word choice intended to exemplify said point)

🔗 Originally posted on Twitter

Per Axbom Twitter

Growing up (and into adulthood) I thought "getting your just deserts" was "just dessert"*. So you only got for dessert what your behaviour merited. It still makes complete sense to me.

*And I know I wasn't alone.

The original meaning of "desert" (pronounced exactly as dessert but more often used in plural) is of course "deserved reward or punishment".

With all my reading on ethics now I realize I'm at a crossroads because some say that "deserts" in that sense is obsolete. And dessert is more fun, and inclusive. When do we claim the meaning of a word has retired?

(I'll likely use both.)

🔗 Originally posted on Twitter