Skip to content
Notes by Axbom
Per Axbom Bluesky

Om 155 dagar kan 13-åringar dömas till fängelse.

Nu är det klart att regeringen går vidare med sitt förslag, trots den massiva kritiken och de häpnadsväckande bristerna vad gäller konsekvensanalys. Och i strid med barnkonventionen, som är svensk lag.

DN rapporterar: www.dn.se/sverige/rege...

@axbom.com: Hjälp mig gärna sprida min artikel. Skriv och ring till politiker. Låt dem veta att det här inte är okej. Om du vill återpublicera hela eller delar av min artikel i din egen publikation är du mer än välkommen.

View original post

🔗 Originally posted on Bluesky

26 Jan 2026, 20:00
Share
LinkedIn Bluesky Email
Per Axbom Bluesky

I have a tool that helps guide people to following your Mastodon/Fediverse account.

Here is my url, but you can replace the username in the url with any Fediverse username.

ff.xbm.se?u=@axbom@axb...

Visitors will enter their own username and be guided through the follow process.

FediFollow - Follow Fediverse Users

🔗 Originally posted on Bluesky

26 Jan 2026, 18:43
Share
LinkedIn Bluesky Email
Per Axbom Akkoma reply

@LeoR1010 yes! 🙌 och intressant med formen för mejl i mobilen och att möta förväntan. Kommunikation är svårt.

🔗 Originally posted on Akkoma

26 Jan 2026, 09:47
Share
LinkedIn Bluesky Email
Per Axbom Akkoma

"Donald Trump is not an interruption of the American story; he is one of its clearest chapters. He condenses habits that long predate him—mythmaking, extraction, spectacle, racial hierarchy, masculine anxiety—into a single, gaudy figure. To look at him carefully is to see the civilisation that made him."

https://richarddavidhames.substack.com/p/the-mirror-cracks

via @mralancooper

🔗 Originally posted on Akkoma

24 Jan 2026, 13:21
Share
LinkedIn Bluesky Email
Per Axbom LinkedIn

"Donald Trump is not an interruption of the American story; he is one of its clearest chapters. He condenses habits that long predate him—mythmaking, extraction, spectacle, racial hierarchy, masculine anxiety—into a single, gaudy figure. To look at him carefully is to see the civilisation that made him."

https://richarddavidhames.substack.com/p/the-mirror-cracks

🔗 Originally posted on LinkedIn

24 Jan 2026, 13:20
Share
LinkedIn Bluesky Email
Per Axbom LinkedIn

När teknik öppet används i förtryckande syfte motsätter sig människor tekniken. När fler och fler har lärt sig om Luddism de senaste åren har de förstått att det aldrig handlade om ”rädsla eller oförståelse inför teknik”. Ironiskt nog är det tvärtom: ludditer förstod tekniken *bättre* än de flesta. Många av de som motsatte sig textilmaskinernas samhällspåverkan hade själva använt dem.

Luddismen handlade mer om hur viss teknik används till, eller uppmuntrar till, att försämra livet för utsatta människor och gynna de som redan besitter makten. Inte sällan på ett våldsamt och frihetsberövande sätt. Utmaningen är alla resurser som makthavare lägger på att osynliggöra förtrycket för att göra det omärkbart och inbäddat.

Att förvanska begreppet luddit till att förlöjliga de som motsätter sig viss teknik är såklart en del i detta. ”Du förstår inte så vi tänker inte ta dig på allvar”. Men Ludditernas uppror drevs av svält, inte av oförståelse för teknik. Denna desperation besvarades med offentliga hängningar av de som hade sönder maskiner.

Historiker idag ser inte ludditerna som irrationella sabotörer utan som tidiga röster i debatten om den industriella kapitalismens etik. Exakt hur deras filosofi och samhällskritik såg ut kommer vi nog aldrig veta. Deras rörelse krävde att man höll dokumentation, och samtal om sitt eget engagemang, till ett minimum. Och även om många själva anammar epitetet luddit idag är det inget jag nödvändigtvis uppmanar till.

Jag personligen väljer dock att se ludditernas kamp och lidande som en uppmaning att själv ofta, och lite längre tid, fundera och reflektera över vidare samhällsfrågor, etik och värderingar. Och då särskilt kopplat till en värld med maskiner jag själv inte har makt över men som är allt mer integrerade och osynliga i vardagen.

Jag vet att min användning av dem drabbar andra människor.

🔗 Originally posted on LinkedIn

24 Jan 2026, 09:55
Share
LinkedIn Bluesky Email
Per Axbom LinkedIn

Gör som Pontus, välj öppna protokoll för publicering och kommunikation . Ju fler av oss som gör det, desto med hållbar blir vår digitala sfär.

Och läs Pontus inlägg och fundera över hur språk från säljare och makthavare ofta är konstruerat för att vilseleda oss:

"Så länge vi kallar LLM-baserade tjänster för verktyg kommer vi att fortsätta låtsas att användaren har kontroll.

Det har hen inte."

Någon som verkligen förstod 'nyspråk' var George Orwell. Så jag tar ett citat från 1984 också:

"Massorna gör aldrig uppror av sig själva, och de gör aldrig uppror bara för att de är förtryckta. Faktum är att så länge de inte får ha jämförelsestandarder blir de aldrig ens medvetna om att de är förtryckta".

🔗 Originally posted on LinkedIn

23 Jan 2026, 08:43
Share
LinkedIn Bluesky Email
Per Axbom Bluesky

Idag är det 160 dagar till dagen då 13-åringar kan dömas till fängelse om regeringen får som de vill. Efter att vi i Sverige haft en straffbarhetsålder på 15 år i 162 år.

@axbom.com: Hjälp mig gärna sprida min artikel. Skriv och ring till politiker. Låt dem veta att det här inte är okej. Om du vill återpublicera hela eller delar av min artikel i din egen publikation är du mer än välkommen.

View original post

🔗 Originally posted on Bluesky

21 Jan 2026, 20:05
Share
LinkedIn Bluesky Email
Per Axbom LinkedIn

Idag är det 160 dagar till dagen då 13-åringar kan dömas till fängelse om regeringen får som de vill. Efter att vi i Sverige haft en straffbarhetsålder på 15 år i 162 år.

🔗 Originally posted on LinkedIn

21 Jan 2026, 19:56
Share
LinkedIn Bluesky Email
Per Axbom LinkedIn

Förvåningen… 🙄

via Läkartidningen: https://lakartidningen.se/nyheter/skane-skjuter-upp-inforandet-av-millennium-brister-i-systemets-anvandbarhet/

🔗 Originally posted on LinkedIn

21 Jan 2026, 11:13
Share
LinkedIn Bluesky Email
Per Axbom Akkoma reply

@ambivalena 💚

🔗 Originally posted on Akkoma

20 Jan 2026, 09:56
Share
LinkedIn Bluesky Email
Per Axbom Bluesky

”The AI can’t do your job, but an AI salesman can convince your boss to fire you and replace you with an AI that can’t do your job. This is key because it helps us build the kinds of coalitions that will be successful in the fight against the AI bubble.”

AI companies will fail. We can salvage something from the wreckage | Cory Doctorow

🔗 Originally posted on Bluesky

19 Jan 2026, 19:54
Share
LinkedIn Bluesky Email
Per Axbom Bluesky

For the idea that AI users will outperform people who don’t use AI to be true, we would have to live in a world where what we already know and what the machine can already do is sufficient for us to succeed. And we don’t. We live in a world of constant change and uncertainty […]

7 Lies About AI. The Philosopher's Guide To Staying Sane You Will Never Get

🔗 Originally posted on Bluesky

19 Jan 2026, 19:48
Share
LinkedIn Bluesky Email
Per Axbom LinkedIn

Seeing social media as a denial-of-service attack on your mind. It makes a ton of sense.

”My argument is that the current structure of public conversation has the same effect on human cognition that a botnet has on a web server. It's simply exhausting you. And an exhausted mind defaults to heuristics and tribal allegiances, aka whatever position allows it to conserve the most cognitive energy.”

”What I do know is that the feeling of being overwhelmed, of never being able to keep up, of having strong opinions about everything and confident understanding of nothing, is not a personal failing. It's a predictable response to an impossible situation. Your brain is being DDoS'd, and the fact that you're struggling to think clearly under that onslaught is evidence that your brain is working normally. The servers aren't broken. They're overloaded. And until we figure out how to reduce the load or increase the bandwidth, the best any of us can do is recognize what's happening and try, when possible, to step away from the flood long enough to do some actual thinking.

”Find some topic you care about. Just one. Resist the temptation to have takes on everything else. Let the discourse rage without you while you spend weeks or months actually understanding something. Read books about it, not takes. Talk to experts, not pundits. Follow the evidence where it leads, even when it's uncomfortable. Change your mind when you find you were wrong. And when you finally have something to say, something you've actually earned through careful thought rather than absorbed from the tribal zeitgeist, say it clearly and then step back.”

”This won't fix the collective problem. But it will fix something in you.”

https://www.joanwestenberg.com/the-discourse-is-a-distributed-denial-of-service-attack/

🔗 Originally posted on LinkedIn

19 Jan 2026, 13:05
Share
LinkedIn Bluesky Email
Per Axbom Akkoma

“When we think of technology as a tool that can be used for good as well as evil, we also think that we are in control of why, when, and for what it is used. But this is only partly the case. We may decide to buy a car to drive ourselves to work. And thus we may think of the car as a tool to achieve our goal of getting to work as fast as possible. But we never made the decision that fast is better than slow. It’s an idea that comes with the car. So is the idea that it should be easy and convenient for us to get to work. And that fast, easy and convenient is more important than the exercise and fresh air we get from walking or cycling.

Like all other technologies, the car comes with a promise that we can achieve more by doing less. And like all other technologies, it makes us think that this is what life is and should be about. But to free ourselves from the chains of technology, we must not only ask the questions we are encouraged to ask when faced with a new technology – like ‘how does it work?’, ‘when can I use it?’, and ‘how much easier will it be to do X?’ We must also ask the questions that the essence of technology discourages us from asking – like ‘do I even need technology for this?’, ‘what does this technology prevent me from doing?’, and ‘what will my life be like if I trust this tool to make this process easier?’”

https://pialauritzen.substack.com/p/7-lies-about-ai-the-philosophers

🔗 Originally posted on Akkoma

19 Jan 2026, 11:10
Share
LinkedIn Bluesky Email
Per Axbom Bluesky

”Find some topic you care about. Just one. Resist the temptation to have takes on everything else. Let the discourse rage without you while you spend weeks or months actually understanding something. Read books about it, not takes. Talk to experts, not pundits. Follow the evidence where it leads…”

The Discourse is a Distributed Denial-of-Service Attack

🔗 Originally posted on Bluesky

19 Jan 2026, 07:51
Share
LinkedIn Bluesky Email
Per Axbom LinkedIn

Today it’s four years since I presented at Raoul Wallenberg Institute on AI and Human Rights. Four years later my messaging is the same.

”To our huge disadvantage is the growing illusion of autonomy, and the invisibility of AI.”

”And core to the huge challenge of reasoning around accountability is the number of actors involved in realizing AI.”

”AI researcher Madelene Clare Elish has named this the moral crumple zone. The moral crumple zone protects the integrity of the technological system, at the expense of the nearest human operator.”

”While China is arguably a human rights menace, we have to be wary of continually pointing to their worst examples as the examples of what to avoid. Those worst examples are getting worse with time, and if we stay the same distance away from them, our human rights missteps are progressively getting worse as well. We need to NOT compare ourselves with China, but to actively proclaim where we draw the line and how we ensure we do not cross it.”

”We have a technology in the hands of a few, born in societies of abundance, and powerful enough to shape the outcome of lives across the planet.

This asymmetry of knowledge and power is a core challenge for human rights. An algorithm that is oppressive, racist, bigoted, misogynous and unfair can be all those things more efficiently than any human.”

”We are creating a more efficient version of the past instead of reimagining the future we want. There is something to be said for human inefficiency, the ability to pause and reflect, taking time to question and taking time to listen. Do we want to allow AI to erase the language, alphabets, culture and stories of poorer countries?

Missing today are the real voices. The voices of the people who are closest to the true problems. People like Peter the maize farmer in Mozambique. The voices of the people living the struggles of being overlooked and excluded, the struggles that we are responsible for creating. Who were warning us of harms long before white academics acknowledged them. If we aren’t working together with them, we are yet again colonizing, occupying and deleting.”

https://axbom.com/aihr/

🔗 Originally posted on LinkedIn

19 Jan 2026, 07:36
Share
LinkedIn Bluesky Email
Per Axbom Akkoma

”My argument is that the current structure of public conversation has the same effect on human cognition that a botnet has on a web server. It's simply exhausting you. And an exhausted mind defaults to heuristics and tribal allegiances, aka whatever position allows it to conserve the most cognitive energy.”

”What I do know is that the feeling of being overwhelmed, of never being able to keep up, of having strong opinions about everything and confident understanding of nothing, is not a personal failing. It's a predictable response to an impossible situation. Your brain is being DDoS'd, and the fact that you're struggling to think clearly under that onslaught is evidence that your brain is working normally. The servers aren't broken. They're overloaded. And until we figure out how to reduce the load or increase the bandwidth, the best any of us can do is recognize what's happening and try, when possible, to step away from the flood long enough to do some actual thinking.

”Find some topic you care about. Just one. Resist the temptation to have takes on everything else. Let the discourse rage without you while you spend weeks or months actually understanding something. Read books about it, not takes. Talk to experts, not pundits. Follow the evidence where it leads, even when it's uncomfortable. Change your mind when you find you were wrong. And when you finally have something to say, something you've actually earned through careful thought rather than absorbed from the tribal zeitgeist, say it clearly and then step back.”

”This won't fix the collective problem. But it will fix something in you.”

https://www.joanwestenberg.com/the-discourse-is-a-distributed-denial-of-service-attack/

🔗 Originally posted on Akkoma

19 Jan 2026, 07:14
Share
LinkedIn Bluesky Email
Per Axbom Akkoma

”Yet far fewer people would disagree that when a billionaire uses their wealth to buy a politician, to influence a government, to own a newspaper or a social media platform, or to out-lawyer any opposition to ensure them impunity from justice, that these actions are inimical to progress and fairness. Such power gives billionaires a grasp over all our futures, undermining political freedom and eroding the rights of the many.”
https://www.oxfam.org.uk/get-involved/campaign-with-oxfam/fight-inequality/oxfams-global-inequality-report/

”We must make our choice. Either we can have extreme wealth in the hands of the few, or we can have democracy. We cannot have both.”
– US Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, over 100 years ago

🔗 Originally posted on Akkoma

19 Jan 2026, 06:57
Share
LinkedIn Bluesky Email
Per Axbom Akkoma

Ägnade en stund åt att rita. Ämnet behöver knappast närmare introduktion.

https://axbom.se/faktaresistent-regering/

Teckning av ett barn bakom galler som håller i en nalle. Barnet tittar ut genom gallret som utgör en glugg i en blå tegelvägg. På den blå tegelväggen har någon klottrat ordet MONSTER. Teckningen är färglagd i mörka toner.

🔗 Originally posted on Akkoma

18 Jan 2026, 21:28
Share
LinkedIn Bluesky Email
← Newer Older →
  • Notes by Axbom
  • RSS

© 2026 Notes by Axbom