↪ Replying to @unknown
@heather_ia @lara_portmann I actually made it up myself right now though I'm sure others have come up with it as well in the past. I put it in quotes as my "translation" of what Twitter was offering in this scenario.
"You get balloons and we get targeting data. It's a win-spin situation!" 🎈
@tuisverige Jag får sms från er angående någon resa. Jag har inte bokat en resa med er. Hur får jag sms:en att sluta komma?
Lyssnar på @medierna:s granskning av DN:s haveri med sin gymnasiejämförelse. Hur vågar man lita på Dagens Nyheter när de inte kan tolka grundläggande statistik innan publicering? Otroligt ledsam händelse.
sverigesradio.se/sida/avsnitt/1…
↪ Replying to @unknown
@theantitheory @lizjosullivan You had me at learning and then scared the crap out of me with amusement.
Well played.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@steveportigal @jarango I read it as "Fuck all three of you".
Luckily I acknowledged that as very off-brand. 😂
↪ Replying to @0x4a45
@dndjeppe @alden_niklas @dagensindustri Det är väl inget i denna text som talar om att det inte går att säga upp prenumerationen under de 12 månaderna?
↪ Replying to @davorfyi
@davortomic To accept present circumstances as immovable is a scary concept for me, especially when you are essentially forced into terms. In numbers I believe all forms of change is possible. Sometimes also by just exposing injustice and unfairness.
Hmm...
nytimes.com/interactive/20…
@davortomic But in my "false dichotomy" statement I also open the playing field to many other options.
* Campaign for more people to close their accounts
* Use other services to circumvent what I don't like
* Build something better
* ...
I'm sure the list can be very long...
This. "If you don't like it, then leave." is a always non-argument. Many services are becoming less and less voluntary. Also, it's a false dichotomy. If I don't like it, I might also choose to work to change what I don't like.
And yes, this is hostile messaging. x.com/CarissaVeliz/s…
↪ Replying to @unknown
@steveportigal @jarango Took me a while tounderstand what you were saying 😂.
I’ll provide this link for reader context:
x.com/steveportigal/…
Wishing now there was a quick course to become a civil rights lawyer so I could step in and better help people from all these shady business practices.
Wait, couldn't I just buy a diploma online? 🤪
↪ Replying to @PeterFellman
@PeterFellman @shitzzer @dagensindustri Tack Peter för svar! Jag är ju medveten om att mycket i organisationer hanteras i silon och att ena delen av ett företag vet alltför lite om vad den andra delen gör. Jätteglad att du tar emot det på detta sätt.
@PeterFellman @shitzzer @dagensindustri Ser förstås extra mycket fram emot att människor inte blir lurade och att de som blivit lurade och inte ens vill ha prenumerationen får avsluta den. :)
@PeterFellman @shitzzer @dagensindustri Om du skickar en postadress så skickar jag gärna min bok Digital omtanke till dig. Du kan mejla per@axbom.se
↪ Replying to @dagensindustri
@dagensindustri Tråkigt att ni väljer att fortsätta med denna kampanj trots att så många blivit lurade.
axbom.blog/dagensindustri/
↪ Replying to @jarango
@jarango But why? Are they running out of internet space?
↪ Replying to @hellomagnus
@hellomagnus @dagensindustri Jag bloggade om detta igår.
axbom.blog/dagensindustri/
↪ Replying to @dagensindustri
@dagensindustri Jätteroligt att det första jag möts av när jag öppnar Twitter är er annons 😂
Toppen om alla läser detta: Om Dagens industri och deras bondfångeri – Ett sorgligt sätt att snärja kunder
axbom.blog/dagensindustri/
↪ Replying to @wheelyweb
@wheelyweb Neither am I. I was really just having a laugh at the realization that many companies and customers will not have thought this through all the way. :)
↪ Replying to @wheelyweb
@wheelyweb How does that play with article 17 of GDPR?