Anyone know of a way of moving ownership of events (in any calendar application) or have multiple owners? As it stands, if the person who created an invite is absent for any reason, no one can make changes or additions to the invite. Surprised this is an unsolved dilemma.
âȘ Replying to @Marm_Design
@MarMurube @leeloowrites Sure! đx.com/axbom/status/1âŠ
âȘ Replying to @anonrandox
@dschatsky I've used many tools over the years but the one I'm using now is SimpleMind Pro. Two things are important for me:
1) Organically shaped lines (rather than straight or otherwise symmetric lines that many tools offer)
2) Sync between iPad and desktop, I frequently shift between
âȘ Replying to @reg_inee
@reg_inee Thank you ReginĂ© for saying this! đ Means a lot to me.
On Tuesday Iâm doing a session for Ambition Empower on running an ethics workshop. I just spent 30 mins on a rough outline of the session by drawing a mindmap.
Mindmapping saves me huge amounts of time. Makes me realise I would love to help more people by teaching mindmapping.
This is the learning program where I'm teaching design ethics for working professionals: ambitiongrp.com/empower/#per
If you're interested in this (you don't have to attend my stuff, there is lots more to exploređ *) then just be aware that using the discount code "uxpodcast" will currently get you ~âŹ100 off the price.
Beautifully written piece on stories and scenario-planning by @ChiaraDiLeone
âComedy and screenwriting techniques can be helpful in dismantling reproductive visions of the future by means of laughter and ridicule.â
noemamag.com/imagine-other-âŠ
In the latest issue of The Edge of Digital Ethics I talk about keeping up appearances. This means for example that regular posts on LinkedIn with a witty and positive attitude doesn't necessarily correlate with a state of emotional wellbeing.
It's also okay to feel overwhelmed and exhausted and hide yourself from the world from time to time. We all replenish in different ways.
Just beware of assuming your own assessment of others is founded on a complete understanding of their circumstances.
https://newsletter.axbom.com/issues/the-edge-of-digital-ethics-keeping-up-appearances-1021323
http://newsletter.axbom.com/issues/the-edge-of-digital-ethics-keeping-up-appearances-1021323
Just sent out issue 7 of The Edge of Digital Ethics: Keeping Up Appearances.
#DigitalEthics
newsletter.axbom.com/issues/the-edgâŠ
âȘ Replying to @Terejs
@Terejs RĂ€tt mĂ„nga filmer publiceras otextade ocksĂ„ (trots att manus ofta finns). Ăven om det blivit lite bĂ€ttre (under 20 Ă„r!) sĂ„ Ă€r omtanken om andra mĂ€nniskor fortfarande pĂ„ en ledsamt lĂ„g nivĂ„, vare sig det Ă€r pĂ„ grund av ointresse eller okunskap. đ
âȘ Replying to @RobinCalmegard
@RobinCalmegard Koköpopa cocykokelol totilollol sosononenon. Dodetot bobloliror kokulol popÄ hohjojulol.
âȘ Replying to @tante
@tante I think Bill Gates has been making this prediction every two years since the 80s.
@tante Okay, so at least since the 90s. đ doanchienthangenglish.wordpress.com/2006/05/05/6/
âȘ Replying to @beantin
@beantin @gmail And that pitch... "easily navigate your spaces, chat, meet and e-mail". I honestly don't use half of that.
@beantin @gmail It's a trap.
BAMAMA.
Acronym for the companies stealing most of the worldâs attention.
ByteDance Apple Microsoft Alphabet Meta Amazon.
Used in a sentence:
âI was hoping for nice, quiet day without disturbances but then I stepped in the BAMAMA.â
Iâm aware âByteDanceâ may cause some confusion. Itâs the Chinese company that owns TikTok.
âȘ Replying to @unknown
@fraying @cydharrell Here's the part in their privacy policy that mentions this. It's one of the creepiest privacy policies I've read to be honest.
Essentially they make deals with the platforms we all use, that already have our email. When we use our apps to visit a site, our data is shared.
@fraying @cydharrell Even worse, what they're really saying here is that if they can figure out who you are based on the account you visited from (or a cookie), they can go to your profile and scrape any public info and use that. Would not surprise me if some of this is manual labor.
âȘ Replying to @unknown
@awelfle What are you calling morning? đ
âȘ Replying to @leondoughty
@leondoughty @YChalt @amanda_m_macias There is no leap. The March 7 number includes March 5 and 6.
x.com/axbom/status/1âŠ
âȘ Replying to @amanda_m_macias
@amanda_m_macias This is how I read these numbers, acknowledging that the first number likely should be spread out over several days prior. I have also averaged March 5, 6 and 7 based on the single March 7 number. (I see people interpreting an increase, while the numbers are quite steady.)
@amanda_m_macias Shown here in a line chart:
x.com/YChalt/status/âŠ
âȘ Replying to @unknown
@grenfeldt @LarssonNM @OAJonsson Jag hÄller med dig. Jag kÀnde ocksÄ att mÄnga lyfter denna tweet som exempel pÄ eskalering, men att man inte tar till sig av att siffran Àr ackumulerad. Gör sig dÀrför mycket bÀttre som stapeldiagram.
âȘ Replying to @unknown
@grenfeldt @LarssonNM @OAJonsson Ja, sÄ hÀr lÀser jag siffrorna. Iofs vare sig sjunkande eller stigande... utan snarare konstant, vilket Àr tillrÀckligt otÀckt.
