I'm not a dev but I managed to figure it out :)
My archive is now up at:
https://twitter.axbom.com
Have no idea what I'm supposed to do with regards to the canonical urls though?
I'm not a dev but I managed to figure it out :)
My archive is now up at:
https://twitter.axbom.com
Have no idea what I'm supposed to do with regards to the canonical urls though?
The Knight Foundation's online event on Democracy in the Digital World is ongoing.
Looks like you can still register.
Coming up is Frances Haugen and Jeff Horwitz in conversation on tech whistleblowing, journalism and public interest.
Later on Yoel Roth, Twitter’s former Head of Trust and Safety, gives his first in-depth interview since resigning from the company.
If you're curious, the agenda and registration form is here:
⚠️ Mastodon meta (verifying websites)
@Janne I believe the most common mistake I see people do is to just wait for the link to be verified.
The verification is only checked when you enter the web address into your profile and press the save button.
So if you have already entered the web address before you add it to the page, you need to re-enter the data in your profile and save again for the check to kick in.
@taylorlorenz Lovely, they have their own definition of everyone.

In the same manner as it is often exclaimed that "This meeting could have been an email", I often frustratingly declare: "This app could have been a web page."
@thespoonless Thank you for sharing. 🙏
Häftigt. Jag gör inte det så tydligt (tror jag) men förstår hur det kan göra gott. Ska prova!
Tänker att när jag skriver fiktion så är utforskandet av alla möjliga vägval en stor del av lockelsen.
@LeoR1010 Det blir nästan inception-känsla för mig i den scenen på något konstigt sätt. Jag blir gråtmild av att Sharon Tate överlever i Tarantinos tidslinje. Att våldet drabbar de egentliga förövarna känns som själva sinnebilden av poetisk rättvisa. Men ändå bara fiktion som på något sätt helar.
@teruki Same to you! 🕯️
Thanks. Just a heads up that the graphic has been updated after this. The most recent version is always here:
That website is running a service that reposts twitter accounts into ActivityPub format that can be read by Mastodon... So it's not a regular Mastodon instance.
It doesn't list a responsible entity...
My interpretation is that it reposts stuff automatically, each account isn't controlled by an individual.
Right now it became overloaded so accounts aren't reachable.
I gather people built things like this for following people on Twitter…
@ruchowdh This is the software it is running. Could be that it's the creator of the software who is running that site.
@chiasm My intent is to block indexing, but generally that's not something I trust completely.
I was recently sent this article which you may find interesting. I've interviewed Heather in the past and she is very knowledgeable.
Thanks, adding that to the backlog.
⚠️ Flowchart: Visibility of a tweet
👍 Nice. I hope you start with the Visbility of a toot. I feel like the comedic effect should work better then.. 😁
⚠️ Flowchart: Visibility of a tweet
@davidlohner Thank you, I was hoping the comedy would shine through to some people. 😊
This is as funny as I get...
I don't use any of the apps, but I would imagine there is a globe icon to select for the federated timeline, as that is what it most commonly is marked with.
🌍
@Shadeprint 🙌🔥
⚠️ Flowchart: Visibility of a tweet
Enough people used my flowchart on the visibility of a toot as a an example of “how complex Mastodon is”, that I just had to make one on the visibility of a tweet.
The visibility of a tweet is always unpredictable. A post on Mastodon appears chronologically in a transparent and predictable way.
Just sayin' 😜

⚠️ Flowchart: Visibility of a tweet
If you haven't seen the first flowchart I made on the visibility of a toot, you'll find it in this blog post:
10 quick Mastodon tips:
https://axbom.com/mastodon-tips/