“Ten skills you need to be a UX unicorn” by @UXMuch medium.com/@uxmuch/ten-sk…
Posts in English
People upset about Twitter's "new" terms of service. But of course, they're not new (actually pretty standard and almost unchanged) and the problem is really that people didn't read them the first time they signed up.
How much of Facebook's terms of service have you read and reflected on?
https://techcrunch.com/2017/09/02/twitters-terms-of-service-are-suddenly-making-people-freak-out-but-theyre-not-new/
When online articles tell us to show more empathy in business and treat customers as humans I shed a tear because this is newsworthy.
↪ Replying to @palu1161
@palu1161 Haha, liten 'Freudian slip' av Facebook. "Användarupplevelse" är väl knappast ett ord man bör använda gentemot sin målgrupp.
@palu1161 Varför skrev de inte bara "positiv upplevelse" tänker jag.
Alltid, alltid på fest hädanefter.
En av mina udda passioner är Nian i SvD. Jag tycker om att stirra på den tills jag kommer på ordet som innehåller alla nio bokstäver. Jag ger oftast mig själv 2 minuter. Den här tog 12 sekunder.
Det är något med min hjärna som älskar ordgåtor.
Ja man får skryta på Facebook. Så det så.
Sparar till en drönare nu. När jag är klar med första utkastet till boken blir det min belöning. Men vilken ska jag ha?
↪ Replying to @beantin
@beantin Absolutely. Which would be fair. But in that scenario it's easier for non-techie people to make a conscious decision.
↪ Replying to @danrhealy
@danrhealy @UXMuch @nickf @uxpodcast Could be!
↪ Replying to @danrhealy
@danrhealy @UXMuch @nickf Yes, and in too many companies UX is brought in when the product is already defined, which can set us up for failure as a profession 😬
@danrhealy @UXMuch @nickf Poor Nick when he wakes up to this thread 😂 I've thoroughly enjoyed it though.
↪ Replying to @UXMuch
@UXMuch @danrhealy @nickf My interpretation was that users had offered this information without this question being asked :)
@UXMuch @danrhealy @nickf But yes, if I had a nickel for every person who said "I won't use this" when the iPad launched...
↪ Replying to @danrhealy
@danrhealy @UXMuch @nickf Hence the 'scissors' in Nick's original tweet I think 😛
↪ Replying to @danrhealy
@danrhealy @UXMuch @nickf Interesting, and then what happened? Design scrapped, back to research?
↪ Replying to @danrhealy
@danrhealy @nickf @UXMuch Testing will show task completion success, rarely goal fulfillment. That tends to take longer in my experience. Plus, you are...
@danrhealy @nickf @UXMuch ...testing you solution, not the validity of what problem you are solving.
@danrhealy @nickf @UXMuch Saying this without being familiar with the Sprint book approach 😂
↪ Replying to @unknown
@Eduardo_Rich Actually I fully understand them. The more I saw it yesterday the more uncomfortable I felt. As @beantin said, good learning moment though.
↪ Replying to @danrhealy
@danrhealy @nickf @UXMuch My interpretation: it's dangerous to design the wrong thing in the right way. Doing it faster amplifies the harm.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@Eduardo_Rich My question is why they're not all now suscribers 😛