↪ Replying to @0x4a45
@dndjeppe @alden_niklas @dagensindustri Det är väl inget i denna text som talar om att det inte går att säga upp prenumerationen under de 12 månaderna?
Posts in English
↪ Replying to @davorfyi
@davortomic To accept present circumstances as immovable is a scary concept for me, especially when you are essentially forced into terms. In numbers I believe all forms of change is possible. Sometimes also by just exposing injustice and unfairness.
Hmm...
nytimes.com/interactive/20…
@davortomic But in my "false dichotomy" statement I also open the playing field to many other options.
* Campaign for more people to close their accounts
* Use other services to circumvent what I don't like
* Build something better
* ...
I'm sure the list can be very long...
This. "If you don't like it, then leave." is a always non-argument. Many services are becoming less and less voluntary. Also, it's a false dichotomy. If I don't like it, I might also choose to work to change what I don't like.
And yes, this is hostile messaging. x.com/CarissaVeliz/s…
↪ Replying to @unknown
@steveportigal @jarango Took me a while tounderstand what you were saying 😂.
I’ll provide this link for reader context:
x.com/steveportigal/…
Wishing now there was a quick course to become a civil rights lawyer so I could step in and better help people from all these shady business practices.
Wait, couldn't I just buy a diploma online? 🤪
↪ Replying to @PeterFellman
@PeterFellman @shitzzer @dagensindustri Tack Peter för svar! Jag är ju medveten om att mycket i organisationer hanteras i silon och att ena delen av ett företag vet alltför lite om vad den andra delen gör. Jätteglad att du tar emot det på detta sätt.
@PeterFellman @shitzzer @dagensindustri Ser förstås extra mycket fram emot att människor inte blir lurade och att de som blivit lurade och inte ens vill ha prenumerationen får avsluta den. :)
@PeterFellman @shitzzer @dagensindustri Om du skickar en postadress så skickar jag gärna min bok Digital omtanke till dig. Du kan mejla per@axbom.se
↪ Replying to @dagensindustri
@dagensindustri Tråkigt att ni väljer att fortsätta med denna kampanj trots att så många blivit lurade.
axbom.blog/dagensindustri/
↪ Replying to @jarango
@jarango But why? Are they running out of internet space?
↪ Replying to @hellomagnus
@hellomagnus @dagensindustri Jag bloggade om detta igår.
axbom.blog/dagensindustri/
↪ Replying to @dagensindustri
@dagensindustri Jätteroligt att det första jag möts av när jag öppnar Twitter är er annons 😂
Toppen om alla läser detta: Om Dagens industri och deras bondfångeri – Ett sorgligt sätt att snärja kunder
axbom.blog/dagensindustri/
↪ Replying to @wheelyweb
@wheelyweb Neither am I. I was really just having a laugh at the realization that many companies and customers will not have thought this through all the way. :)
↪ Replying to @wheelyweb
@wheelyweb How does that play with article 17 of GDPR?
↪ Replying to @JesperBylund
@JesperBylund Two sentences in the e-mail. ”This e-mail has also been deleted from our records, and we no longer have any saved information about you. We will only save your e-mail address if you provide it to us again, by contacting us or signing up.”
Or something to that effect.
@bbcmicrobot
10 FOR N=0 TO 63
20 PLOT N, 22+20*SIN (N/32*PI)
30 NEXT N
↪ Replying to @JesperBylund
@JesperBylund Well I know it's technically feasible but nothing in the e-mail provides that information.
But it's more the broader understanding that some data actually needs to be saved and will be saved as part of regular communication.
It's not so much ciriticism as an observation :)