So among this morning's many thoughts on how to force ethics into more conversations I'm suddenly keen to start up a Stockholm Institute of Applied Ethics for Digital.
Feels feasible... maybe 😬
Posts in English
"For the most part, these are not psychiatric disorders that people are having. These are ordinary responses to an extraordinary situation. People are overwhelmed, and that’s to be expected […]. Everybody is going to be affected, absolutely everyone."
greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/a…
A 2-year study looked at how 1,019 people aged between 13 and 18 engaged with digital health via apps, social media, and the internet.
While we've had poor messaging to teens in the past, I believe notifications and ubiquity exacerbate the impact.
bbc.com/news/uk-englan…
Waking up early and finding myself reading about right-wing authoritarianism (RWA).
I guess it's still 2020.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-win…
↪ Replying to @markhurst
@markhurst @lizjosullivan @shoshanazuboff Exactly, because they still obviously scan it.
variety.com/2017/digital/n…
↪ Replying to @markhurst
@markhurst @lizjosullivan @shoshanazuboff Oh I'm not condoning their practices in any way, but not perjury. I think asking that question allows for this answer and they look better than they should.
↪ Replying to @markhurst
@markhurst @lizjosullivan @shoshanazuboff As far as I've gotten in the book she has talked about the previous practices and how surprised people were to learn this was going on. But maybe there is more. I'm reading it now :)
↪ Replying to @markhurst
@markhurst @lizjosullivan Didn't they stop doing that a couple years ago? qz.com/1014816/google…
↪ Replying to @biteable
@teambiteable Axbom - Making tech safe and compassionate through design, coaching and teaching. :)
When you first appreciated two-factor authentication via text messages only to later realise you just provided another unique identifier to track you across the web...
↪ Replying to @hypervisible
@hypervisible Yes, about to have a late lunch but I can send you a link to try it after if you want. :)
↪ Replying to @unknown
@olaberg 👍 Can you recommend more reading on this? I would have guessed this was because western countries place their production there.
“Experts”: We need to figure out how to live sustainably. Let's do a workshop!
Indigenous peoples: Yeah, we were doing that way before you came along… maybe if you would just... [powerful response].
(This is fiction, because they were never invited to the meeting.)
↪ Replying to @hypervisible
@hypervisible @ubiquity75 @whereby It’s Norwegian :) I use everything that’s not Zoom. And preferably also non-US based ;)
↪ Replying to @hypervisible
@hypervisible @ubiquity75 Don't want to impose on you here, but a hot tip is creating a @whereby room where you can actually share view a YouTube video (live ones too) while keeping the conference audio intact as well. The free room is for 4 people but $10 will get you 12 people. (I'm not affiliated 😂).
@hypervisible @ubiquity75 @whereby I may have jumped the gun regarding audio. The sidebar with chat will work, and you can see each other, but now I'm not sure about audio. Maybe @whereby can jump in with regards to collaborative YouTube viewing? Anyway, you know you're seeing the same thing at the same time.
Who is watching the hearing today? Is there a backchannel I should know about, should I create one? Thinking social viewing can help make sense of what's said. Just tweeting out loud here before thinking. I might watch in my @whereby room, which allows shared viewing...