Posts in English

Per Axbom Twitter

On #HolocaustRemembranceDay I've remembered how IBM used machines to enable genocide.

axbom.blog/digital-compas…

The man on the left in this picture is Adolf Hitler. The man sitting on Hitler’s left side is Thomas J. Watson, leader of IBM during the years 1914 to 1956.

Starting in in 1933, IBM’s exclusive punch card technology was used to categorize and streamline Hitler’s plans. We now know that the punch cards, machines, training and servicing were all controlled from IBM’s headquarters in New York and later through subsidiaries in Germany.

In 2012, documents revealed codes of the concentration camps and numbers used to codify people. Number 3 for Homosexual, 8 for Jew, 9 for Anti-social, and number 12 for ā€˜gypsies’. ā€˜Special treatment’ was the euphemism for gas chamber. Other codes specified the destined camp.

IBM’s artificial intelligence platform today bears Watson’s name and their 2019 campaign proudly proclaims that you now can have ā€œWatson anywhereā€œ. In light of how Watson was a key player in profiting from the Holocaust… it’s beyond tone-deaf.

IBM’s defense when approached with all this knowledge builds on the premise ā€œWe’re a technology company, not historiansā€ Note that we are living in times when ā€œWe are just a technology companyā€ is a valid rationalization for automated human destruction. jewishvirtuallibrary.org/ibm-and-quot-d…

Also wanted to bring attention to some quotes attributed to this successful businessman. When reading some of them, think about who his customer was.

Read more in @EdwinBlackBook’s IBM and the Holocaust
ibmandtheholocaust.com

You can also start in his article from 2012 on Huffington Post:
huffpost.com/entry/ibm-holo…

My blog post has further references.

šŸ”— Originally posted on Twitter

Per Axbom Twitter

The only way to predict the future is to make it. Hence two main paths to avoiding accountability for the future:

1. Showing the receipts for how you resisted.
2. Plausible deniability of creating it:

Ergo:
ā€œI don’t remember a conversation like that.ā€

ThreadšŸ‘‡

ā€œPlausible deniability is the ability of people, typically senior officials in a formal or informal chain of command, to deny knowledge of or responsibility for any damnable actions committed by others in an organizational hierarchy because of…

a lack or absence of evidence that can confirm their participation, even if they were personally involved in or at least willfully ignorant of the actions.ā€

— en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausible…

Creating the conditions for ā€œplausible avoidance of responsibility for one's future actions or knowledgeā€ of course requires foresight.

Ironically: It requires that one creates this future.

And it’s created by having actions carried out covertly on one’s behalf by 3rd parties.

In effect, this *encourages* actions being carried out without the knowledge of leaders, to safeguard them from accountability. Which means mercenary operatives are given incentive to act independently, keeping leadership in the dark.

This gives us reason to truly question who we are allowing to create the future and what their end-goal is, when even the leadership – for their own protection – strives to know as little as possible.

#ManagementByDeniability

šŸ”— Originally posted on Twitter