On the one hand they say algorithms will change everything. On the other hand they repeatedly downplay the potential damage algorithms can do.
Posts in English
âȘ Replying to @deeped
@deeped @troed Det Àr de verkligen inte ensamma om, som jag poÀngterar flera gÄnger ;)
âȘ Replying to @deeped
@deeped @troed Oj, lÀste du det sÄ? Nej, jag menade att delning av data bör inbjuda till mer övervÀgning och mer valmöjlighet, precis som Apple gör redan nu med delning av fotobiblioteket. Att det inte ska vara lika lÀtt att snabbt godkÀnna utan eftertanke.
@deeped @troed Jag fÄr lÀsa ett par varv till och höra med andra hur de tolkade de dÀr formuleringarna. Att spÀrra delning av data tyckte jag inte att jag uttryckte.
âȘ Replying to @unknown
@troed @deeped TÀnker du att det Àr det vanligaste sÀttet som anvÀndarna hanterar frÄgan pÄ?
âȘ Replying to @deeped
@deeped Jag poĂ€ngterar tydligt att CH inte Ă€r unika, sĂ„vĂ€l i ingress, inledning o avslutet. Det viktiga för mig Ă€r att alla sjĂ€lvklart fĂ„r dela sin information, men att lĂ€ttvindigt dela *andras* information Ă€r det som Ă€r ett övertramp. Ăr ocksĂ„ tydlig med att jag inte Ă€r helt mot appen.
@deeped Jag skriver inte heller att all informationsdelning alltid Ă€r negativ(?), utan att man bör uppmuntra försiktighet med delning. Jag nĂ€mner till exempel @project_solid som Tim Berners-Lee jobbat med, för att adressera den större problematiken. Försöker förstĂ„ âanti-dikeâ.
@deeped @project_solid NĂ„vĂ€l, uppenbarligen misslyckades jag att nĂ„ fram med nyanseringen i det hĂ€r fallet. De tvĂ„ invĂ€ndningar du har i din tweet kĂ€nner jag sjĂ€lv inte motsĂ€ger nĂ„got jag skrivit, eller en Ă„sikt jag har. Jag tackar för Ă„terkopplingen och hoppas lyckas bĂ€ttre med orden nĂ€sta gĂ„ng. đ
âȘ Replying to @JaredFossey
@JaredFossey Yes, I should have given you more credit. Best phonetic description Iâve seen.
âȘ Replying to @JaredFossey
@JaredFossey Almost.
@JaredFossey Of course I don't know how you pronounce hwyds, which I thought was an awesome way of writing it đ
The Swedish Authority for Privacy Protection has recently changed name from âDatainspektionenâ to
âIntegritetsskyddsmyndighetenâ.
Yes, one word. Half my time time speaking to journalists now is spent on getting the pronunciation of that name right and hesitating each time. đ
To complete the picture, here is the same name in three of Sweden's five official minority languages (2 are still undecided):
Finnish: Yksityisyydensuojaviranomainen
MeÀnkieli: Integriteettisuojaviranomhainen
Yiddish: ŚŚ Ś©ŚŚŚąŚŚŚ©Śą ŚŚŚ ŚĄŚŚÖ·Ś Ś„ Ś€ÖżŚÖ·Śš ŚÖžŚ€ÖŒŚŚŚŚ Ś€ÖŒŚšŚŚŚŚÖ·ŚŚ§ŚŚŚ
âȘ Replying to @unknown
@Acuity_Design I have learnt so much from just attending workshops where you were clear on allowing everyone to participate on their own terms. I have adopted a lot of this - and just putting that out there for everyone creates a safer space, based on feedback . While nothing is perfect.
âȘ Replying to @unknown
@Acuity_Design This started with me reflecting clinical trial consent, and then reading to understand the levels of consent: simple consent, written consent, informed consent and how the consent also affects close relationships⊠while itâs mostly framed as an individual, autonomous choice.
@Acuity_Design Consent as a piece of paper with a signature is somewhat distressing.
Even consent is a slippery slope. You always have to ask:
- what understanding is the consent based on?
- what loose promises are expected to be upheld by the consent?
- is the consent value-based, needs-based or coercion-based?
How consent is gained can be hugely unethical.
Adding a section on consent to my ethics curriculum. :)
I finally hung my photo of Astrid Lindgren in my studio. Bought it as a company Christmas present for myself. I don't know what does it, but I am enamored with this photograph.
So yeah, you need to click the tweet to see the full photo. I'm not talking about my panda pillow, just wanted to provide context of where it's hanging. ;)
âȘ Replying to @unknown
@snowracer Skit ocksÄ. NÄja, bÀttre att veta Àn att inte veta. Toppen som sagt att du flaggade.
âȘ Replying to @unknown
@snowracer Haha, jag hÄller precis pÄ att pilla med detta... det ligger inget konkret dÀr Ànnu men jag inser att risken nu finns att nÄgon signar upp redan nu... sÄ jag skyndar sÄ gott jag kan. TÀnker mig ett gÀng mallar och nÄgra members-only event att börja med...
Kul att du delade đ
@snowracer VĂ€nta, dök den upp i RSS-flödet? đŹ
@snowracer Ănnu viktigare nu dĂ„ att du pingade mig. Tack. Förbaskade internet-trĂ„dar och rör som Ă€r felkopplade. Nej, det var helt my bad för att jag jobbade sent nĂ€r jag var trött.
âȘ Replying to @adtac_
@adtac_ Hoping you can help me with my latest issue after I switched domains. See email ;)
@adtac_ Trying again, still no response...
Biblioteksbladet har Ă„terpublicerat min text om Clubhouse och integriteten.
https://www.biblioteksbladet.se/nyheter/clubhouse-och-integriteten/
âIn reality, a number of studies have shown that most of the money made from targeted advertising does not reach the creators of the contentâthe app developers and the content they host.â
eff.org/deeplinks/2020âŠ
Loss of life
Slavery
Oppression
Impaired autonomy
Ignored voice
Hurt feelings
These are not equal harms. But sometimes the differences arenât as clear-cut. That is why ethics is a conversation, not a checklist. Still worth noting that a checklist can assist the conversation.
Also note: these are not siloed harms and everything is subject to second and third order thinking. Ignored voice can lead to oppression can lead to loss of life. This is why strategic foresight, listening and inclusion of voices are all part of applied ethics.
Another one of those words that gets thrown around a lot as an example of harm is âaddictionâ. Here are my thoughts on addiction in the tech space:
axbom.com/tech-addiction/