Per Axbom
↪ Replying to @jmspool
@jmspool 👍 You’re thinking of IASSIDD or something else?
↪ Replying to @jmspool
@jmspool Boy you’re fast today 😃. Has a nice ring to it doesn’t it? Unless it clashes with something. Need to check that.
International Alliance for Sustainable and Inclusive Design.
Stay tuned.
What did I just watch? An @ArchieComics Carrie (Stephen King) musical. And I liked it! 😂 #S02E18 of @CW_Riverdale.

Am I getting this right? It’s Barbara Bush’s funeral and the president of the US was not invited, but Melania is attending side-by-side with Clintons and Obamas. The president is golfing. x.com/maggienyt/stat…
[sv] Stort. Mockup:en som används i tweet:en gjorde jag för 4 år sedan. Sedan dess har Sveriges bästa team byggt plattformen och nu alltså rullat ut den i hela landet. 🙌 x.com/1177vardguiden…
↪ Replying to @JErnestam
@JErnestam @bjorklundjan @librix Tack för genomgången, riktigt bra!
One disfavor begets another.
axbom.eu/one-disfavor-b…

The most important tool, no discussion, that has helped me in my design work is "listening without prejudice". I'm not saying I'm the best at it, but it is something I intentionally practice to become better at.
The first step to getting better is accepting you are ill.
#designethics
5 minutes with... Per Axbom. I talk about why I am pushing so much for #designethics.
wearesigma.com/news/5-minutes…
5 minutes with... Per Axbom. I talk about why I am pushing for ethics in the design industry.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@Acuity_Design You're right of course. I make changes to workshop and talk material based on feedback all the time. Listening is key. If I'm going to write something in a book it will live longer and I want to be as mindful as is humanly possible. Your point about context helps me, though.
Categorizing vulnerable people is always, and should be, a sensitive subject. My intent in doing it is to bring disadvantaged groups to the attention of people building things so that they may become better at assessing impact and managing risk. »
A word that is troublesome and has a ring of falsehood to it, is "minority". I am now looking for better words. For example, in a list of vulnerable groups, under the heading "Who?" I may say "Gender disadvantaged".
I am well aware that minority does not truly refer to numerical minority, but to a social minority, lacking in major positions of social power. The word minority however itself brings connotations of "less" that I wish to avoid.
I am hugely grateful for any input you may have on the subject and specifically on avoiding the word minority and thoughts on various alternatives. 🙏
Just solved a programming dilemma that I could not solve in 90 minutes earlier today. I sat down and in front of my computer and didn't blink. Problem solved in 3 minutes. How important it is to regularly shift focus.
↪ Replying to @unknown
@pedrobjorn @ilovegraphics @IxDASthlm Tough questions require evasive answers. I’m already learning to be a politician 😜
↪ Replying to @kalle_hansson
@kalle_hansson Ja den skiljer sig. Jag var på plats på bägge föreläsningarna :) Han har nu börjat med något som han kallare ancestry thinking.
@kalle_hansson Det man gör på mindre än 5 minuter ska man göra direkt. Här är mina 5 favoriter :) telegra.ph/Interaction18-…
↪ Replying to @kalle_hansson
@kalle_hansson Det har jag... ska försöka hinna posta en lista. Men börja förstås med Alan Cooper :)
Still on my mind is @gitta reminding me yesterday how much we are training our brains to read short snippets of information and then move on, increasing the effort required to read long texts. My intent is to practice the latter, which is why I prefer reading paper books again.
I was just reading an article with a researcher saying how she is noticing how an increasing number of students seem to lack the stamina required to read and write long texts. Anecdotal, yes, but worthy as an artefact for assessing risks.
I enjoyed this article from @sciam [Scientific American], reminding us of how physical books give content shapes, something that can aid memory and recall but is not present in e-books. scientificamerican.com/article/readin…