Per Axbom
↪ Replying to @johnliungman
@johnliungman @Henrik_lindhoIm Här är länk: x.com/KHayhoe/lists/…
↪ Replying to @stucampo
@stucampo @Floridi @oiioxford Wow, getting access to read this proved quite difficult... too bad :/
📍 Posted in: UX Sverige
Jag inbillar mig att det finns brister i hanteringen av personuppgifter vid användningsundersökningar. Funderar på att skriva en artikel med ungefär:
Ditt ansvar för information under GDPR.
Så kan ett samtyckesdokument se ut.
Lagring av informationen och resultatet.
Risker vid transkribering.
Myten om anonymitet.
Hantering av rätten att bli raderad.
Har du koll på detta eller tror du att det skulle vara av värde för dig? Vilka övriga funderingar har du?
↪ Replying to @unknown
@barbiche meh... digitalisering juh! skitsamma hur d funkar ihop med människor.
↪ Replying to @ruchowdh
@ruchowdh @automaticyes omfg vulnerageous... your tweet was perfect in this context.
To succeed in lying, blend it with truth.
To succeed in harm, blend it with help.
To succeed in exploitation, blend it with benevolence.
To succeed in fighting lies, harm and exploitation... beware of kindliness being used as a veil for malice.
↪ Replying to @DougCollinsUX
@DougCollinsUX @Adobe @AdobeXD Hmm... am I understanding this right that the text will be read twice for screen readers?
↪ Replying to @hanspagel
@hanspagel @jamie_gaskins @smashingmag @Medium switching.social/ethical-altern…
↪ Replying to @H_Stahl
@H_Stahl Ett av de mest populära skämten att sno. Finns som t-shirt, mugg, tote bag... you name it ;)
x.com/search?q=guy%2…
@H_Stahl Min sökning ger att @jasongay var först på Twitter med det: x.com/jasongay/statu…
"Google knew these women had been tricked, held captive, sexually assaulted and humiliated and were suffering because of the exposure it was causing, but corporate interest dictated total indifference."
#digitalethics #digitaldecency
nypost.com/2019/08/17/how…
With facial recognition on the uprise, it won't matter if you move and change your name in the future. And so the most vulnerable will continue to be the ones who suffer the most.
↪ Replying to @snetramelleh
@snetramelleh @mor10 Haha, that's how I read it as well!
↪ Replying to @DanWatersDesign
@DanWatersDesign This is a great question. It does come up now and then and I have plenty of thoughts on it. Excellent idea for an article, thanks.
This is such a bizarre response. Not only is it wrong (it’s not secure) but they are not even supposed to have your password in plain text.
(Read the thread leading to this response.) x.com/virginmedia/st…
It's when doing the work we have time to reflect on the outcome of our work.
When we hand the work to someone else we relieve ourselves of too much thinking about the outcome.
When we automate, time for reflection around outcomes is minimised.
Reflection is vital to ethics.
↪ Replying to @lizvlx
@lizvlx Always! It means the world to me to have these ideas copied.
I have a history of using the lemonade stand as an example :)
axbom.blog/ux-lemonade/
↪ Replying to @ruchowdh
@ruchowdh With regards to my own thoughts on the exercise I’ll keep it hush-hush for a bit since I know students follow me here. With regards to the contents of the course I’ve been meaning to share curriculum contents, but I have to translate it from Swedish and been putting it off.
@ruchowdh When people ask me I tend to put it higher in my todo list though :) I know if I share I’ll ge valuable feedback to make it better. I’ll definitely schedule both for blog posts. Still officially not back from my long Swedish holiday 😁
↪ Replying to @ptrkhmbrg
@ptrkhmbrg Cool, tänk vad ouppmärksam man kan vara inför något man inte letar efter.