@fngrlngpote
Yes, a possible timeline. Will depend on how costly the mistake is, and how quickly regulation will prevent the tool from accessing content without consent.
Tagged: reply
@Beantin
Isn't it always the customer's fault when they fail to make sense of our enigmatic communication, and we fail to anticipate how they use our product? 🤪
@OneiricBotcelot @mateitudor @AntennaPod
I am still attached to PocketCasts, but Antennapod looks neat.
https://pocketcasts.com
@Androiders @Jeramee
It's a fair question, as the usability of surfacing and sharing an RSS link just isn't there yet. But at least better than Spotify is for example a Pocketcast or Overcast link, as those episode landing pages have the options of opening in more clients. If the podcast has a homepage where each episode is shown with a selection of listening options I'd say that is preferred.
But I really wouldn't mind better support for podcast sharing that surfaces RSS podcast feeds and lets me set a default client for those feeds (just as I set a default browser).
I'm always thinking, surely someone has built something akin to this already 😅
@brennacgray Great work! Thanks for sharing.
@mjj @interfluidity @signalapp
I really need to do a writeup on this, but aware of the hurdles with Signal I can also recommend Whereby, which I have been using for client meetings many years now. It's Norwegian.
https://whereby.com/information/meetings
@samuel
Actually THE Browser Company 😀
https://thebrowser.company/
I reacted to their latest newsletter.
@mjj It's an interesting point. The way it works Signal doesn't store any information about its users nor any chats... they're all on the user's device. As long as one trusts this, it doesn't matter if a government can request data, Signal doesn't have it.
@Loukas
Friend of a friend of the publisher? 😉
Do you find it surprising that this is published in Time?
@AnnemarieBridy
Absolutely, and it’s positive that they strive for more.
For me the dilemma starts before the LLMs, as the amount of content available online for training large language models in different languages is quite unbalanced, as the article suggests. Hence their performance will differ significantly depending on language. It’s a bias built into the fabric of the internet (and hence the training data) rather than an inherent problem of language models.
We often forget that there are more than 6,000 languages in the world. I take every opportunity to remind myself of this. 😊
@eternaltyro That was a really good read! Thank you 🙏
Appreciated the nuclear vs solar narrative, which brought a lot of clarity.
I haven’t seen Oppenheimer yet but it feels a good opportunity today to draw these parallells as this is currently top-of-mind in more societal contexts. This has given me lots of ideas for new content.
@chris Gah. I actually did not know that.
@potato_lisper I agree, this is a disadvantage. But less of a dilemma in situations where everyone’s phone number should already be known by all participants.
@m Holy moly!!!