@Beantin Very cool. I had no idea this was possible.
Tagged: Akkoma
@MariaLiv Ja, precis, och Konsumentverket (efter att mÄnga anmÀlningar kommit in) har ju sagt Ät dem för mer Àn ett Är sedan, men det faller lite platt med brevvÀxling som enda tillsÀgelse.
Det Àr lite si och sÄ med tillÀmpningen kan jag tycka.
https://axbom.se/dagens-industri-konsumentverket/
@snowracer Jag trodde det ocksÄ, men inte nÀr de kör kampanjer, typ 99 kr för 3 mÄnader. DÄ kör de fortfarande med att det förlÀngs pÄ Ärsbasis om man missar att sÀga upp i tid (en vecka innan kampanjperiodens slut).
TÀnk att bli inlÄst i kostnader pÄ 30.000 kronor. Det sticker i ögonen pÄ mig nÀr Dagens industri gÄr ut och skryter om att det ökat mÀngden prenumeranter. Jag fÄr fortfarande mejl, fyra Är senare, frÄn mÀnniskor som i ren och skÀr panik vill ha hjÀlp att komma ur dyra Di-prenumerationer. Eller bara vill berÀtta vilka hÀpnadsvÀckande inlÄsningar de fastnat i, som denna kommentar pÄ min blogg frÄn 4 december (jag har fixat nÄgra korrfel men original-texten syns i bilden):
Magnus. 2023-12-04:
"Mitt problem upptÀckte jag av en slump efter flera Ärs prenumeration pÄ Di. Minns att jag började med ett billigt erbjudande som steg efter ett tag tÀnkte inte pÄ det dÄ jag gillade tidningen och gör Àn. Sen steg priset lite till och jag tÀnkte det var en Ärlig höjning men som sagt tidningen var bra och jag körde pÄ. Sen upptÀckte jag att det dragits över 1000kr nu vid semestertiderna i somras och sÄg att det hade gjorts tre gÄnger. Skickade en uppsÀgning omgÄende dÄ jag inte har rÄd. Det tog en vecka sen kom en bekrÀftelse pÄ att den Àr uppsagd till 2026-05-30. Jag ska alltsÄ betala frÄn nu ytterligare 30 mÄnader för nÄgot jag inte vill ha. Det Àr 30 000kr. Har panik och vet inte vad jag ska göra. HjÀlp mig gÀrna om ni har nÄgot förslag pÄ vad jag ska göra. Har inte heller nÄgon aning om hur detta gÄtt till."
20 februari 2020 skrev jag mitt första inlÀgg om Dagens industri. Det Àr dÀr kommentarer fortsÀtter komma, eller direktmejl till mig.
https://axbom.se/dagensindustri/
Den 13 februari 2023 figurerade min kritik i ett inslag av PlÄnboken i P1 dÄ Di kritiserats av Konsumentverket:
https://axbom.se/dagens-industri-konsumentverket/
Den korta versionen av historien med Konsumentverket Àr att de bad DI att förklara varför de fÄtt in sÄ mÄnga anmÀlningar gÀllande Vilseledande marknadsföring och OskÀliga avtalsvillkor. DI svarade med en krystad förklaring som gÀller en text som fallit bort i bekrÀftelsemejlet (som om avtal inte ingÄs innan bekrÀftelsen skickas). Konsumentverket nöjer sig med det och avslutar med andemeningen "okej men gör inte om det för vi hÄller ögonen pÄ er".
Men jag undrar om det Àr nÄgon som hÄller ögonen pÄ Di? Inga andra dagstidningar i alla fall.
Om du vill berÀtta om dina erfarenheter sÄ Àr du vÀlkommen att höra av dig till mig, anonymt via Signal eller mejl. Men jag rÄder dig ocksÄ att anmÀla till Konsumentverket.
KonsumentvÀgledare Gabriel Södersten sÀger sÄ hÀr i PlÄnboken-inslaget:
"Jag skulle sÀga att den hÀr typen av⊠sÀttet att binda upp konsumenter pÄ, det Àr ju det vi brukar se i rÄdgivningen kring sÄdana hÀr företag som sysslar med abonnemangsfÀllor nÀstan dÄ, att man: 'nÀ men hÀr Àr ett prova-pÄ-paket i tre mÄnader' och sÄ stÄr det i det finstilta 'du blir samtidigt bunden i ett Är' och mÄste betala fyra tusen kronor till.
SÄ att det Àr ju den hÀr typen av tillvÀgagÄngssÀtt det Àr ju inte riktigt kanske det man brukar förknippa med en stor, seriös, svensk dagstidning utan med lite mer obskyra bolag skulle jag sÀga."
ĂVERSKOTTSBEFĂL.
Det sÀgs man ska vara företagssam
men kan en ĂB vara företagsman
med en sÄdan strÀng av lapsus pÄ sin lyra
att han i varje Àmne fÄr bedyra
en drivkraft mer Àn bara företagsgagn?
@stephenpa @scottjenson
I've _just_ switched to a self-hosted version of cal.com
@nafnlaus The decision to design them this way is purely human. There are a multitude of human decisions even in unsupervised "learning", when it comes to labelling and modelling. The fact that many of these algorithms are a black box when it comes to predictability is only an example of humans building an error-prone system based on human material.
The machine is also an extension of all human error contained in the unsupervised training material, including historical and representation bias. It's further adding more human input to the mix, not less. All that human labor fed into the machine, and none of those humans visible. Again, it's hard to see the humans (who produced all that content) because of the machines.
Unsupervised training is for example also how Child Sexual Abuse Material has made its way into image generators, and descriptions of abuse and violence into all the text generators. There are people working around the clock across the world to prevent this content from appearing in generated content. More invisible humans doing invisible labor.
I agree they aren't puppets, although puppet features exist in AI as well (deepfake generators). But they are truly not a separate entity from human influence and decision-making. The way I see it, it's all they are. And sometimes that leads to exacerbating human bias rather than minimising it.
Fascinated by the rebuttal that humans make mistakes too, so algorithms should be allowed to as well.
As if the machine is disconnected from the humans building, deploying and using them.
The machines are an extension of human mistakes, not its own separate entity with free will.
It would appear, ironically, that when a huge number of humans are involved in building the machines, the humans become invisible.
Future historians:
"They couldn't see the humans because of all the machines."
#AIEthics #DigitalEthics
@Caution
This makes me so happy đ Thank you for letting me know.
@JMMaok
@Caution @JMMaok
I couldn't resist making a real demo in jsbin:
https://output.jsbin.com/gapapox/
@JMMaok
While I donât get a chance to code myself as much anymore, the recommendation would be to not style headings but instead apply class names for the visual appearance. Hence one would separate semantic hierarchy (h1âŠh6) from look-and-feel.
For instance:
<style>
.TitleXL {font-size: 2em}
.TitleL {font-size: 1.8em}
.TitleM {font-size: 1.4em}
.TitleS {font-size: 1.2em}
</style>
In my example then it would be.
<h1 class=âTitleXLâ>Site Name</h1>
<h2 class=âTitleLâ>Article 1</h2>
<h2 class=âTitleMâ>Article 2</h2>
<h2 class=âTitleMâ>Article 3</h2>
<h2 class=âTitleSâ>Social media</h2>
<h2 class=âTitleSâ>Resources</h2>
<h2 class=âTitleSâ>Abous us</h2>
<h2 class=âTitleSâ>Contact info</h2>
To complicate things, if I was building this page I would likely add a separate heading for the whole footer area. That heading would then be h2 and the four columns would each have an h3. But it was a quick example đ
@JMMaok
If that is your only visual clue I would agree, but I would presume that there are other design features that indicate how a heading or title is related to the content it refers to.
I made a quick sketch to explain.
In the attached sketch there are three articles but one is displayed as a featured article and the title of that article is visually displayed in a larger font.
If in this case the site title is chosen to be h1 then each of those three article titles would be h2, regardless of their visual size on screen. From the design, it is clear which content element each article refers to.
Moving on to the footer of the site, I have drawn 4 sections, or columns, with 3 links each. The heading of each of those sections is visually smaller than any of the article titles. But in this specific example they would be h2 headings as well, or the hierarchical structure would be off. If in the code they were h3 or h4, they would be interpreted as belonging to article 3, as they would then be subheadings under that article.
But I doubt that anyone looking at this page would interpret the footer headings to be subheadings of article 3, even if they are smaller than that heading. Similarly, the two articles in the center of the page are not easily interpreted as being part of article 1, even if the title fonts of article 2 and article 3 are smaller. The overall visual cues tell the whole story. The code should tell the same story.
@SuperTaliaDX
Itâs a fair question. It functionally makes a difference primarily within 1) accessibility and 2) machine interpretation.
In the case of accessibility, the correct heading hierarchy makes it easier to navigate content and understand how different parts of a page relate to each other. With missing or misplaced headings the content becomes more confusing to read with a screen reader*. Jumping between, and listing, the headings of a page are common ways of navigating.
Similary, if machine interpretation is used to determine for example main, supporting and related content it can help pull relevant content to respond to questions and infer importance of one piece of content over another.
One very simple and common example would be an automated table of contents to jump to different sections of a page.
*(The use of a screen reader is of course also an example of machine interpretation)
@evilcookies98
h1 is generally the title of the page OR the title of the main article.
h2 will be subheadings
h3 will be subheadings to h2 sections
So you may not be doing it wrong?
What people tend to get wrong is the idea that they can not add h2 below h4. That just means that you are starting a new topic, which is fine. I also see people using h4 in for headings in sidebars (that are about something else than the main article) because they want a smaller font. But since they are new topics, they should often be h2, for example.
So, generally, like this is how one should think (example from the W3C page:
<h1>Plant foods</h1>
<h2>Fruit</h2>
<h3>Apple</h3>
<h3>Banana</h3>
<h2>Vegetables</h2>
<h3>Broccoli</h3>
<h3>Green breans</h3>
<h2>Related articles</h2>
Since this is the internet, someone will soon inform me that bananas are botanically berries. đ
W3C on headings: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/H42
There has long been a debate about whether you can have multiple h1's on a page, and generally, yes, I would argue that you can. Which Matt Cutts from Google also confirmed 15 years ago:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIn5qJKU8VM
Let me say it louder for the people in the back⊠heading levels (h1, h2, h3âŠ) in html are not about size, they are about structure. They communicate the organization of your page.
An h2-heading in one part of your page or site does not have to be the same size as an h2-heading in another part or your page or site. The purpose of the heading is to semantically communicate hierarchy.
In fact, deciding that all h2 headings must be the same size across your website will usually lead to poor decisions with regards to the underlying structure of your page.
So yes, the heading in your footer should likely be an h2 but it doesnât have to be the same size as the h2 in an article. And no you shouldnât make it an h4 âbecause I want it smallerâ!
This may be one of the most misunderstood elements of web design.
#WebDesign
@samuel
En Ghost-installation per domÀn. Men du kan ha flera författare per installation. DÄ fÄr varje författare en sÄdan hÀr sida med alla sina inlÀgg:
https://axbom.se/author/axbom/
Eftersom jag anvÀnder Cloudron kan jag starta en ny Ghost-installation med ett klick.
SÄ t ex https://digitill.se och https://dataskuggan.se Àr tvÄ av mina sajter ocksÄ. För elever har jag en med inloggning: https://etik.axbom.se/ och ibland planerar jag bokskrivande pÄ det sÀttet ocksÄ: https://debook.axbom.com/
@fiaewald @konstellationen
@samuel @fiaewald
Ghost Ă€r bĂ€st. đ Jag skrev ju den hĂ€r lĂ„nga nĂ€r jag bytte: https://axbom.com/from-wp-to-ghost/ och sedan om Indieweb generellt.
Allt stĂ€mmer inte i inlĂ€gget lĂ€ngre men jag svarar ocksĂ„ gĂ€rna pĂ„ frĂ„gor. Har nog 5-6 Ghost-sajter nu. đ
De har ocksÄ en Substack-importer nu, vilket kan vara högst relevant.
@samuel @fiaewald
Obs att den artikeln handlar om en flytt till betalversionen av Ghost, medan jag numera kör Ghost pÄ min egen VPS, sÄ hÀr
https://axbom.com/indieweb/
Engineers be like "Why aren't humans adapting to how my machine works?"
@grimalkina Yay! Congrats, Cat!
@redegelde All but one are available on my website. It will be part of an upcoming post.
Direct links:
https://axbom.com/aipower/
https://axbom.com/aielements/
https://axbom.com/bias-in-machine-learning/
https://axbom.com/hammer-ai/
https://axbom.com/aicom/
Theyâre also reachable in the featured section of the homepage:
https://axbom.com