@kallekn Jag hade lyssnat hela morgonen från Spanarna, genom Konflikt och kan nog mycket riktigt varit i början av Medierna när jag skrev detta 😁
Posts in English
Love this article by Carissa Véliz!
"And bullshit is dangerous, warned Frankfurt. Bullshit is a greater threat to the truth than lies. The person who lies thinks she knows what the truth is, and is therefore concerned with the truth. She can be challenged and held accountable; her agenda can be inferred. The truth-teller and the liar play on opposite sides of the same game, as Frankfurt puts it. The bullshitter pays no attention to the game. Truth doesn’t even get confronted; it gets ignored; it becomes irrelevant."
https://time.com/6299631/what-socrates-can-teach-us-about-ai/
Alltså helvete vilken bra public service-radio vi har i Sverige ändå.
Ville bara säga det.
More people need to understand the vitriol and harm that X/Twitter exacerbates, and how it puts in harms way the very people hired to protect others. Leaders, politicians (in many countries) and the owner of the platform himself have contributed to the very real harm directed towards now former employees.
Yoel Roth served as the head of Twitter's trust and safety department, a position he stepped down from in November 2022.
"[…] Elon Musk added fuel to the fire. I’ve lived with armed guards outside my home and have had to upend my family, go into hiding for months and repeatedly move."
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/18/opinion/trump-elon-musk-twitter.html
@sphakos Nice. Thank you for sharing. I was hoping it would be in the “opposite” direction, but now I see how this will obviously happen in both directions depending on where your mind starts…
@Itty53 I feel like I’m just really curious about people and love hearing their reflections, as it’s such an odd human phenomenon. I’m thinking no two people likely have the same overall experience or the same take. But that hearing them reflect on this adds a novel dimension.
But yes, I’ve also considered the ethical aspect of it all - how much of the sharing has been done without consent. And how many keep not caring how the person in the meme may or may not feel about it.
I’m actually not sure I could truly tell you why I care… I’m not sure I know myself.
All those babies in memes that we have used for so many years now… I imagine there being a future conference where they all get together to share stories about meme fame.
I mean they almost all have superhero names too...
Success Kid
Disaster Girl
Side-Eyes Chloe
Popeyes
Finger-Biting Charlie
U-Turn Baby
Smurf Eater
I would be standing outside fighting to get a glimpse of them all.
Though it just struck me this is probably already a ComicCon sideshow.
Touch. Connect. Hold.
These words mean different things depending on who you are, where you are and what you are doing.
When I direct criticism towards technology I do so because I believe that technology can be better. I want it to be better.
My conviction is that technology built with love, with kindness, is far superior to technology built with the purpose of growth.
Technology can divide communities, or it can unite communities. Technology can aggravate pain, or it can heal wounds.
It is only progress when it unites, when it heals. Being able to tell the difference between progress and erosion is crucial.
Touch. Connect. Hold.
These words mean different things depending on what you are thinking about what I just said.
What are you thinking?
@joacim Tack. Nu kommer jag inte kunna se något annat heller… 🥴
The reason I developed a communication model for AI-powered chatbots is to encourage and guide a human-centered approach to the implementation of AI-powered services and products. You can think of it as a tool that helps you better consider inclusive design, trustworthiness and safety.
Tech tools can be powerful and useful, and the chances of that are greater when we understand and design for improved human-machine interplay. Without this, even tools with the potential to solve significant problems can easily be rejected.
For example, these are the types of circumstances that will affect how a human approaches and begins using a tool:
Expectations.
How have the person's expectations been formed and how well do they match what is possible in the given situation? How can we help keep these expectations at a good level?
Ability.
Given the person's experience, knowledge and physical and cognitive capacity, how well equipped is the person to interact with the computer - for example, when it comes to phrasing inputs and prompts in a way that makes the computer produce a result they are satisfied with. How do we ensure that the tool is adapted to the operator's ability?
Context.
What context is the person currently in and might this, for example, affect their ability to act as they themselves would like. How do we work with understanding context and taking this into account?
Intent.
Does the person have an intent that we can subsequently check and verify. How do we help the operator phrase their intent?
Code.
Can the person encode their intention, linguistically, in a way that makes it, for example, distinct or useful to the computational model in a way that minimizes ambiguity. What support can help make the coding of the question more accurate?
Expression.
Does the input contain an expression that can affect the computational model in any direction? For example, this could pertain to formal, casual or childish language. How permissive or guiding should the tool be regarding these expressions?
The model goes on to describe ways of managing a computational model, in terms of "black box" characteristics, interpretation and computation (over truth).
Managing the response from the AI-powered service brings with it further parameters that we need to consider.
My communication model is free to use, and all of its components are described in my post. If you need more design assistance and advice when managing organisational change brought on by tech, you know where to find me. 😊
Det känns ibland som att många har glömt att det går att ringa. Normal-läget är nu att korta avstämningar ska göras via video-möten som tar längre tid och kostar mer energi i form av datorkraft och bandbredd.
Hur gör du, har du möten via telefon ibland? Utan bild alltså.
Jag kan rekommendera promenad-möten via telefon. Var och en promenerar på sitt håll. Skärmar behövs trots allt inte alltid.
Men absolut, du kan självklart fortfarande boka mötet i kalendern. Om man som jag länge lidit av telefonfobi så är det till stor hjälp att veta exakt när ett möte ska ske.
Det här med att våra svenska dagstidningar fortsätter använda och bekräfta gängkriminellas smeknamn och alias som om de vore gängens egna PR-byråer… 😤
@fiaewald Man vad håller de på med… *djup suck*
Why spend time criticising technology? Langdon Winner expresses this succinctly in the preface of his seminal book, The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology.
« In its approach to these matters, this is a work of criticism. If it were literary criticism, everyone would immediately understand that the underlying purpose is positive. A critic of literature examines a work, analyzing its features, evaluating its qualities, seeking a deeper appreciation that might be useful to other readers of the same text. In a similar way, critics of music, theater, and the arts have a valuable, well-established role, serving as a helpful bridge between artists and audiences. Criticism of technology, however, is not yet afforded the same glad welcome. Writers who venture beyond the most pedestrian, dreary conceptions of tools and uses to investigate ways in which technical forms are implicated in the basic patterns and problems of our culture are often greeted with the charge that they are merely "antitechnology" or "Blaming technology." All who have recently stepped forward as critics in this realm have been tarred with the same idiot brush, an expression of the desire to stop a much needed dialogue rather than enlarge it. If any readers want to see the present work as "antitechnology," make the most of it. That is their topic, not mine.
What does interest me, however, is identified in the book's subtitle: A Search for Limits. In an age in which the inexhaustible power of scientific technology makes all things possible, it remains to be seen where we will draw the line, where we will be able to say, here are possibilities that wisdom suggests we avoid. I am convinced that any philosophy of technology worth its salt must eventually ask, How can we limit modern technology to match our best sense of who we are and the kind of world we would like to build? In several contexts and variations, that is my question throughout. »
Why spend time criticising technology? Langdon Winner expresses this succinctly in the preface of his seminal book, The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology.
« In its approach to these matters, this is a work of criticism. If it were literary criticism, everyone would immediately understand that the underlying purpose is positive. A critic of literature examines a work, analyzing its features, evaluating its qualities, seeking a deeper appreciation that might be useful to other readers of the same text. In a similar way, critics of music, theater, and the arts have a valuable, well-established role, serving as a helpful bridge between artists and audiences. Criticism of technology, however, is not yet afforded the same glad welcome. Writers who venture beyond the most pedestrian, dreary conceptions of tools and uses to investigate ways in which technical forms are implicated in the basic patterns and problems of our culture are often greeted with the charge that they are merely "antitechnology" or "Blaming technology." All who have recently stepped forward as critics in this realm have been tarred with the same idiot brush, an expression of the desire to stop a much needed dialogue rather than enlarge it. If any readers want to see the present work as "antitechnology," make the most of it. That is their topic, not mine.
What does interest me, however, is identified in the book's subtitle: A Search for Limits. In an age in which the inexhaustible power of scientific technology makes all things possible, it remains to be seen where we will draw the line, where we will be able to say, here are possibilities that wisdom suggests we avoid. I am convinced that any philosophy of technology worth its salt must eventually ask, How can we limit modern technology to match our best sense of who we are and the kind of world we would like to build? In several contexts and variations, that is my question throughout. »
Det här är viktigt.
@ceracole Very much so. It appears to be in the works, but likely not ready for release until 2025.
https://netflixlife.com/2023/07/18/extraordinary-attorney-woo-season-2-release-updates/
I can’t even begin to express how much I love Extraordinary Attorney Woo.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraordinary_Attorney_Woo
#ExAttyWoo
That mother-daughter scene at the end of episode 8 broke me…
Somewhat blown away by how much I’m loving this. Must be a serendipity discovery.
@joacim
Fattar. Jag bor ju själv typ i skogen vid en sjö numer även om jag har nära till stan. Mark Isitt avskyr inte storstäder i sig, men kanske har en särskild aversion till vad det blivit av Stockholm, Göteborg och Malmö... 😁